Child immunization status according to number of siblings and birth order in 85 low- and middle-income countries : a cross-sectional study
© 2024 The Authors..
Background: Identification of unvaccinated children is important for preventing deaths due to infections. Number of siblings and birth order have been postulated as risk factors for zero-dose prevalence.
Methods: We analysed nationally representative cross-sectional surveys from 85 low and middle-income countries (2010-2020) with information on immunisation status of children aged 12-35 months. Zero-dose prevalence was defined as the failure to receive any doses of DPT (diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus) vaccine. We examined associations with birth order and the number of siblings, adjusting for child's sex, maternal age and education, household wealth quintiles and place of residence. Poisson regression was used to calculate zero-dose prevalence ratios.
Findings: We studied 375,548 children, of whom 13.7% (n = 51,450) were classified as zero-dose. Prevalence increased monotonically with birth order and with the number of siblings, with prevalence increasing from 11.0% for firstborn children to 17.1% for birth order 5 or higher, and from 10.5% for children with no siblings to 17.2% for those with four or more siblings. Adjustment for confounders attenuated but did not eliminate these associations. The number of siblings remained as a strong risk factor when adjusted for confounders and birth order, but the reverse was not observed. Among children with the same number of siblings, there was no clear pattern in zero-dose prevalence by birth order; for instance, among children with two siblings, the prevalence was 13.0%, 14.7%, and 13.3% for firstborn, second, and third-born, respectively. Similar results were observed for girls and boys. 9513 families had two children aged 12-35 months. When the younger sibling was unvaccinated, 61.9% of the older siblings were also unvaccinated. On the other hand, when the younger sibling was vaccinated, only 5.9% of the older siblings were unvaccinated.
Interpretation: The number of siblings is a better predictor than birth order in identifying children to be targeted by immunization campaigns. Zero-dose children tend to be clustered within families.
Funding: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:71 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
EClinicalMedicine - 71(2024) vom: 30. März, Seite 102547 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Costa, Francine S [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Birth order |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 26.03.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102547 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370144937 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370144937 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240327000237.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240326s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102547 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1349.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370144937 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38524919 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Costa, Francine S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Child immunization status according to number of siblings and birth order in 85 low- and middle-income countries |b a cross-sectional study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 26.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024 The Authors. | ||
| 520 | |a Background: Identification of unvaccinated children is important for preventing deaths due to infections. Number of siblings and birth order have been postulated as risk factors for zero-dose prevalence | ||
| 520 | |a Methods: We analysed nationally representative cross-sectional surveys from 85 low and middle-income countries (2010-2020) with information on immunisation status of children aged 12-35 months. Zero-dose prevalence was defined as the failure to receive any doses of DPT (diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus) vaccine. We examined associations with birth order and the number of siblings, adjusting for child's sex, maternal age and education, household wealth quintiles and place of residence. Poisson regression was used to calculate zero-dose prevalence ratios | ||
| 520 | |a Findings: We studied 375,548 children, of whom 13.7% (n = 51,450) were classified as zero-dose. Prevalence increased monotonically with birth order and with the number of siblings, with prevalence increasing from 11.0% for firstborn children to 17.1% for birth order 5 or higher, and from 10.5% for children with no siblings to 17.2% for those with four or more siblings. Adjustment for confounders attenuated but did not eliminate these associations. The number of siblings remained as a strong risk factor when adjusted for confounders and birth order, but the reverse was not observed. Among children with the same number of siblings, there was no clear pattern in zero-dose prevalence by birth order; for instance, among children with two siblings, the prevalence was 13.0%, 14.7%, and 13.3% for firstborn, second, and third-born, respectively. Similar results were observed for girls and boys. 9513 families had two children aged 12-35 months. When the younger sibling was unvaccinated, 61.9% of the older siblings were also unvaccinated. On the other hand, when the younger sibling was vaccinated, only 5.9% of the older siblings were unvaccinated | ||
| 520 | |a Interpretation: The number of siblings is a better predictor than birth order in identifying children to be targeted by immunization campaigns. Zero-dose children tend to be clustered within families | ||
| 520 | |a Funding: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Birth order | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Global health | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health surveys | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Siblings | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Vaccination | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Silva, Larissa A N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cata-Preta, Bianca O |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Santos, Thiago M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ferreira, Leonardo Z |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mengistu, Tewodaj |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hogan, Daniel R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Barros, Aluisio J D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Victora, Cesar G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t EClinicalMedicine |d 2018 |g 71(2024) vom: 30. März, Seite 102547 |w (DE-627)NLM289300495 |x 2589-5370 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:71 |g year:2024 |g day:30 |g month:03 |g pages:102547 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102547 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 71 |j 2024 |b 30 |c 03 |h 102547 | ||