Cost effectiveness analysis for commonly used human cell and tissue products in the management of diabetic foot ulcers
© 2024 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC..
Background and Aims: This study considers the cost-effectiveness of commonly used cellular, acellular, and matrix‑like products (CAMPs) of human origin also known as human cell and tissue products (HCT/Ps) in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.
Methods: We developed a 1-year economic model assessing six CAMPs [cryopreserved placental membrane with viable cells (vCPM), bioengineered bilayered living cellular construct (BLCC), human fibroblast dermal substitute (hFDS), dehydrated human amnion chorion membrane (dHACM), hypothermically stored amniotic membrane (HSAM) and human amnion membrane allograft (HAMA) which had randomized controlled trial evidence compared with standard of care (SoC). CAMPs were compared indirectly and ranked in order of cost-effectiveness using SoC as the baseline, from a CMS/Medicare's perspective.
Results: The mean cost, healed wounds (hw) and QALYs per patient for vCPM is $10,907 (0.914 hw, 0.783 QALYs), for HAMA $11,470 (0.903 hw, 0.780 QALYs), for dHACM $15,862 (0.828 hw, 0.764 QALYs), for BLCC $18,430 (0.816 hw, 0.763 QALYs), for hFDS $19,498 (0.775 hw, 0.757 QALYs), for SoC $19,862 (0.601 hw, 0.732 QALYs) and $24, 214 (0.829, 0.763 QALYs) for HSAM respectively. Over 1 year, vCPM results in cheaper costs overall and better clinical outcomes compared to other CAMPs. Following probabilistic sensitivity analysis, vCPM has a 60%, HAMA 40% probability of being cost-effective then dHACM, hFDS, BLCC, and lastly HSAM using a $100,000/healed wound or QALY threshold.
Conclusions: All CAMPs were shown to be cost-effective when compared to SoC in managing DFUs. However, vCPM appears to be the most cost-effective CAMP over the modelled 52 weeks followed by HAMA, dHACM, hFDS, BLCC, and HSAM. We urge caution in interpreting the results because we currently lack head-to-head evidence comparing all these CAMPs and therefore suggest that this analysis be updated when more direct evidence of CAMPs becomes available.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:7 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Health science reports - 7(2024), 3 vom: 30. März, Seite e1991 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Nherera, Leo M [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Cellular and/or tissue‐based products, CAMPs |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 26.03.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1002/hsr2.1991 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370143442 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370143442 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240327000223.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240326s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/hsr2.1991 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1349.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370143442 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38524772 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nherera, Leo M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cost effectiveness analysis for commonly used human cell and tissue products in the management of diabetic foot ulcers |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 26.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. | ||
| 520 | |a Background and Aims: This study considers the cost-effectiveness of commonly used cellular, acellular, and matrix‑like products (CAMPs) of human origin also known as human cell and tissue products (HCT/Ps) in the management of diabetic foot ulcers | ||
| 520 | |a Methods: We developed a 1-year economic model assessing six CAMPs [cryopreserved placental membrane with viable cells (vCPM), bioengineered bilayered living cellular construct (BLCC), human fibroblast dermal substitute (hFDS), dehydrated human amnion chorion membrane (dHACM), hypothermically stored amniotic membrane (HSAM) and human amnion membrane allograft (HAMA) which had randomized controlled trial evidence compared with standard of care (SoC). CAMPs were compared indirectly and ranked in order of cost-effectiveness using SoC as the baseline, from a CMS/Medicare's perspective | ||
| 520 | |a Results: The mean cost, healed wounds (hw) and QALYs per patient for vCPM is $10,907 (0.914 hw, 0.783 QALYs), for HAMA $11,470 (0.903 hw, 0.780 QALYs), for dHACM $15,862 (0.828 hw, 0.764 QALYs), for BLCC $18,430 (0.816 hw, 0.763 QALYs), for hFDS $19,498 (0.775 hw, 0.757 QALYs), for SoC $19,862 (0.601 hw, 0.732 QALYs) and $24, 214 (0.829, 0.763 QALYs) for HSAM respectively. Over 1 year, vCPM results in cheaper costs overall and better clinical outcomes compared to other CAMPs. Following probabilistic sensitivity analysis, vCPM has a 60%, HAMA 40% probability of being cost-effective then dHACM, hFDS, BLCC, and lastly HSAM using a $100,000/healed wound or QALY threshold | ||
| 520 | |a Conclusions: All CAMPs were shown to be cost-effective when compared to SoC in managing DFUs. However, vCPM appears to be the most cost-effective CAMP over the modelled 52 weeks followed by HAMA, dHACM, hFDS, BLCC, and HSAM. We urge caution in interpreting the results because we currently lack head-to-head evidence comparing all these CAMPs and therefore suggest that this analysis be updated when more direct evidence of CAMPs becomes available | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Diabetic foot ulcers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cellular and/or tissue‐based products, CAMPs | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cost‐effectiveness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cost‐utility | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Banerjee, Jaideep |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Health science reports |d 2018 |g 7(2024), 3 vom: 30. März, Seite e1991 |w (DE-627)NLM28665525X |x 2398-8835 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:30 |g month:03 |g pages:e1991 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1991 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 7 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 30 |c 03 |h e1991 | ||