TikTok content as a source of health education regarding epicondylitis : a content analysis
© 2024. The Author(s)..
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the validity and informational value of TikTok content about epicondylitis. The hypothesis tested herein was that TikTok video content would not provide adequate and valid information.
METHODS: The term "epicondylitis" was used as a keyword to comprehensively search for TikTok videos, and the first 100 videos that were retrieved were subsequently included for analysis. The duration, number of likes, number of shares and number of views were recorded for each video. Furthermore, the videos were categorized on the basis of their source (medical doctor, physiotherapist, or private user), type of information (physical therapy, anatomy, clinical examination, etiopathogenesis, patient experience, treatment, or other), video content (rehabilitation, education, or patient experience/testimony), and the presence of music or voice. Assessments of video content quality and reliability were conducted using the DISCERN tool, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS).
RESULTS: A total of 100 videos were included in the analysis: 78 (78.0%) were published by physiotherapists, 18 were published by medical doctors (18.0%), and 4 were published by private users (4.0%). Most of the information pertained to physical therapy (75; 75.0%) and most of the content was about rehabilitation (75; 75.0%). The mean length of the videos was 42.51 ± 24.75 seconds; the mean number of views was 193,207.78 ± 1,300,853.86; and the mean number of comments, likes, and shares were 22.43 ± 62.54, 1578.52 ± 8333.11, and 149.87 ± 577.73, respectively. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 18.12 ± 5.73, 0.80 ± 0.53, and 1.30 ± 0.52, respectively. Videos posted by medical doctors/private users had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos posted by physiotherapists. Videos that focused on education or patient experience had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos based on rehabilitation.
CONCLUSIONS: TikTok can be an unreliable source of information regarding epicondylitis treatment. It is common to find nonphysicians who share medical advice on the platform, with medical treatments demonstrating the weakest level of supporting evidence. Elbow surgeons should advise their patients that treatment recommendations from TikTok may not align with established guidelines.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Cross-sectional study.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:25 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology - 25(2024), 1 vom: 23. März, Seite 14 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
D'Ambrosi, Riccardo [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Elbow |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.03.2024 Date Revised 26.03.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s10195-024-00757-3 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370114612 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370114612 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240327000018.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240324s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s10195-024-00757-3 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1349.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370114612 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38521890 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a D'Ambrosi, Riccardo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a TikTok content as a source of health education regarding epicondylitis |b a content analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 25.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 26.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the validity and informational value of TikTok content about epicondylitis. The hypothesis tested herein was that TikTok video content would not provide adequate and valid information | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: The term "epicondylitis" was used as a keyword to comprehensively search for TikTok videos, and the first 100 videos that were retrieved were subsequently included for analysis. The duration, number of likes, number of shares and number of views were recorded for each video. Furthermore, the videos were categorized on the basis of their source (medical doctor, physiotherapist, or private user), type of information (physical therapy, anatomy, clinical examination, etiopathogenesis, patient experience, treatment, or other), video content (rehabilitation, education, or patient experience/testimony), and the presence of music or voice. Assessments of video content quality and reliability were conducted using the DISCERN tool, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 100 videos were included in the analysis: 78 (78.0%) were published by physiotherapists, 18 were published by medical doctors (18.0%), and 4 were published by private users (4.0%). Most of the information pertained to physical therapy (75; 75.0%) and most of the content was about rehabilitation (75; 75.0%). The mean length of the videos was 42.51 ± 24.75 seconds; the mean number of views was 193,207.78 ± 1,300,853.86; and the mean number of comments, likes, and shares were 22.43 ± 62.54, 1578.52 ± 8333.11, and 149.87 ± 577.73, respectively. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 18.12 ± 5.73, 0.80 ± 0.53, and 1.30 ± 0.52, respectively. Videos posted by medical doctors/private users had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos posted by physiotherapists. Videos that focused on education or patient experience had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos based on rehabilitation | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: TikTok can be an unreliable source of information regarding epicondylitis treatment. It is common to find nonphysicians who share medical advice on the platform, with medical treatments demonstrating the weakest level of supporting evidence. Elbow surgeons should advise their patients that treatment recommendations from TikTok may not align with established guidelines | ||
| 520 | |a LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Cross-sectional study | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Elbow | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epicondylitis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reels | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rehabilitation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social media | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sports medicine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a TikTok | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bellato, Enrico |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bullitta, Gianluca |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cecere, Antonio Benedetto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Corona, Katia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a De Crescenzo, Angelo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fogliata, Valentina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Micheloni, Gian Mario |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Saccomanno, Maristella Francesca |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vitullo, Fabrizio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Celli, Andrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a SICSeG (Italian Society of Shoulder, Elbow Surgery) Research Committee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology |d 2002 |g 25(2024), 1 vom: 23. März, Seite 14 |w (DE-627)NLM187985669 |x 1590-9999 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:23 |g month:03 |g pages:14 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00757-3 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 23 |c 03 |h 14 | ||