Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement : A systematic review and meta-analysis
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
OBJECTIVES: To systematically analyze the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on October 25, 2023. Model studies or clinical studies reporting the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement among patients with missing or hopeless teeth were included. Risks of bias in clinical studies were assessed. Meta-analyses were undertaken.
RESULTS: Data from 8 clinical studies reporting on 109 patients and 242 implants and 13 preclinical studies were included. Positional accuracy was measured by comparing the implant plan in presurgery CBCT and the actual implant position in postsurgery CBCT. For clinical studies, the pooled (95% confidence interval) platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.68 (0.57, 0.79) mm, 0.67 (0.58, 0.75) mm, and 1.69 (1.25, 2.12)°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of implants placed in partially or fully edentulous patients. For model studies, the pooled platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.72 (0.58, 0.86) mm, 0.90 (0.74, 1.06) mm, and 1.46 (1.22, 1.70)°, respectively. No adverse event was reported.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of the present systematic review, robotic surgery for dental implant placement showed suitable implant positional accuracy and had no reported obvious harm. Both robotic systems and clinical studies on robotic surgery for dental implant placement should be further developed.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Clinical oral implants research - (2024) vom: 22. März |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Wu, Xin-Yu [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Accuracy |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 22.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1111/clr.14255 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370066308 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370066308 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240323002345.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240323s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/clr.14255 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1341.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370066308 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38517053 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wu, Xin-Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement |b A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 22.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVES: To systematically analyze the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement | ||
| 520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on October 25, 2023. Model studies or clinical studies reporting the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement among patients with missing or hopeless teeth were included. Risks of bias in clinical studies were assessed. Meta-analyses were undertaken | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Data from 8 clinical studies reporting on 109 patients and 242 implants and 13 preclinical studies were included. Positional accuracy was measured by comparing the implant plan in presurgery CBCT and the actual implant position in postsurgery CBCT. For clinical studies, the pooled (95% confidence interval) platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.68 (0.57, 0.79) mm, 0.67 (0.58, 0.75) mm, and 1.69 (1.25, 2.12)°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of implants placed in partially or fully edentulous patients. For model studies, the pooled platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.72 (0.58, 0.86) mm, 0.90 (0.74, 1.06) mm, and 1.46 (1.22, 1.70)°, respectively. No adverse event was reported | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of the present systematic review, robotic surgery for dental implant placement showed suitable implant positional accuracy and had no reported obvious harm. Both robotic systems and clinical studies on robotic surgery for dental implant placement should be further developed | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a accuracy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a dental implants | |
| 650 | 4 | |a digital dentistry | |
| 650 | 4 | |a robotic surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a systematic review | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shi, Jun-Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Qiao, Shi-Chong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tonetti, Maurizio S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lai, Hong-Chang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical oral implants research |d 1992 |g (2024) vom: 22. März |w (DE-627)NLM012715808 |x 1600-0501 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:22 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.14255 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 22 |c 03 | ||