RECOMA study : Evaluation of quality of life and satisfaction after immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: Breast reconstruction after mastectomy, whether immediate or delayed, is an integral part of the overall management of breast cancer. However, up to 40 % of reconstructed patients are not satisfied with the aesthetic result. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate satisfaction and quality of life according to the reconstruction techniques used in our center. The secondary objectives were to identify the parameters that could influence satisfaction and quality of life after surgery, to list the main complications, and the number of operations required to consider the reconstruction process as completed.
METHOD: A retrospective monocentric study, RECOMA, was carried out at the CHRU Minjoz in Besançon. All patients who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2021 were contacted by post or e-mail and asked to complete the standardized BREAST-Q postoperative module.
RESULTS: Of 508 patients contacted, 149 were included. Reconstructed patients reported satisfaction, but also "average" quality of physical and psychological sexual life. Only the surgeon's assessment was rated as "good". There was no significant difference in satisfaction and quality of life depending on the reconstruction method chosen. On the other hand, patients who underwent nipple areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction had a significantly higher psychic quality of life score (P=0.02). In addition, a significant decrease in physical satisfaction was observed over time(P=0.049). An average of 2.4 operations was required to consider breast reconstruction complete.
CONCLUSION: In our opinion, breast reconstruction is an essential procedure to be considered as soon as the indication for mastectomy is given, but it is a process that requires the patient to be prepared for a result that may be weaker than expected, may require several operations, and may be complicated.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie - (2024) vom: 19. März |
| Sprache: |
Französisch |
|---|
| Weiterer Titel: |
Étude RECOMA : évaluation de la qualité de vie et de la satisfaction après reconstruction mammaire immédiate ou différée |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Boudry, Thibaud [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
BREAST-Q |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 11.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.006 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370034643 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370034643 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240412233102.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240323s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.006 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1373.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370034643 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38513889 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S2468-7189(24)00089-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a fre | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Boudry, Thibaud |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a RECOMA study |b Evaluation of quality of life and satisfaction after immediate or delayed breast reconstruction |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a Étude RECOMA : évaluation de la qualité de vie et de la satisfaction après reconstruction mammaire immédiate ou différée |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 11.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: Breast reconstruction after mastectomy, whether immediate or delayed, is an integral part of the overall management of breast cancer. However, up to 40 % of reconstructed patients are not satisfied with the aesthetic result. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate satisfaction and quality of life according to the reconstruction techniques used in our center. The secondary objectives were to identify the parameters that could influence satisfaction and quality of life after surgery, to list the main complications, and the number of operations required to consider the reconstruction process as completed | ||
| 520 | |a METHOD: A retrospective monocentric study, RECOMA, was carried out at the CHRU Minjoz in Besançon. All patients who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2021 were contacted by post or e-mail and asked to complete the standardized BREAST-Q postoperative module | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Of 508 patients contacted, 149 were included. Reconstructed patients reported satisfaction, but also "average" quality of physical and psychological sexual life. Only the surgeon's assessment was rated as "good". There was no significant difference in satisfaction and quality of life depending on the reconstruction method chosen. On the other hand, patients who underwent nipple areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction had a significantly higher psychic quality of life score (P=0.02). In addition, a significant decrease in physical satisfaction was observed over time(P=0.049). An average of 2.4 operations was required to consider breast reconstruction complete | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: In our opinion, breast reconstruction is an essential procedure to be considered as soon as the indication for mastectomy is given, but it is a process that requires the patient to be prepared for a result that may be weaker than expected, may require several operations, and may be complicated | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a English Abstract | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a BREAST-Q | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Breast cancer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Breast reconstruction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cancer du sein | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mastectomie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mastectomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality of life | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Qualité de vie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reconstruction mammaire | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Maisonnette Escot, Yolande |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pluvy, Isabelle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Feuvrier, Damien |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Houvenaeghel, Gilles |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ramanah, Rajeev |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie |d 2017 |g (2024) vom: 19. März |w (DE-627)NLM269302743 |x 2468-7189 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:19 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.006 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 19 |c 03 | ||