Influence of using synbiotics by various routes on Mandarah male chicks : intestinal bacterial counts, gut morphology and histological status
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
This experiment investigated the influence of different synbiotic processing methods on the intestinal bacterial count, morphology and histological status of developed male Mandarah chicks. Two hundred and ten male Mandarah line chicks aged 1 d were randomized to receive one of 7 chicks. The method and dose for 1-time synbiotics administration to the day-old chicks were as follows: G1: chicks on basal diet received no treatment (control); G2: 0.25 mL synbiotics sprayed; G3: 0.50 mL synbiotics sprayed; G4: 0.25 mL of synbiotics are added to drinking water; G5: 0.50 mL of synbiotics are added to drinking water; G6: 0.25 mL of synbiotics dripped into the mouth; and G7: 0.50 mL of synbiotics dripped into mouth drops. Lactic acid bacteria(LAB) were significantly increased (P<0.0001) compared to the control group and other treated groups and had the maximum values after the use of synbiotics via drinking water (0.25 or 0.50 mL). Furthermore, when comparing the treated birds (G4, G5) with the control birds, the Escherichia coli concentration in the drinking water containing synbiotics was significantly lower. In addition, treated chickens at (G7) showed a higher duodenum, ileum villus height (VH), and VH. - Ileum crypt depth (CD) ratio compared to other groups. In addition, birds treated with 0.50 mL of synbiotics in drinking water (G5) performed better in duodenum, ileum, CD and VH. - CD ratio than the other groups. Meanwhile, intestinal tract length and visceral pH did not differ significantly between groups. It can be concluded that the use of 0.25 mL of synbiotics in drinking water can improve the overall health of birds.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:103 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Poultry science - 103(2024), 5 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 103601 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Youssef, Islam M [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Drinking Water |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 30.04.2024 Date Revised 30.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.psj.2024.103601 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369927451 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369927451 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240430232148.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240320s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103601 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1393.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369927451 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38503136 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0032-5791(24)00180-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Youssef, Islam M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Influence of using synbiotics by various routes on Mandarah male chicks |b intestinal bacterial counts, gut morphology and histological status |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 30.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 30.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a This experiment investigated the influence of different synbiotic processing methods on the intestinal bacterial count, morphology and histological status of developed male Mandarah chicks. Two hundred and ten male Mandarah line chicks aged 1 d were randomized to receive one of 7 chicks. The method and dose for 1-time synbiotics administration to the day-old chicks were as follows: G1: chicks on basal diet received no treatment (control); G2: 0.25 mL synbiotics sprayed; G3: 0.50 mL synbiotics sprayed; G4: 0.25 mL of synbiotics are added to drinking water; G5: 0.50 mL of synbiotics are added to drinking water; G6: 0.25 mL of synbiotics dripped into the mouth; and G7: 0.50 mL of synbiotics dripped into mouth drops. Lactic acid bacteria(LAB) were significantly increased (P<0.0001) compared to the control group and other treated groups and had the maximum values after the use of synbiotics via drinking water (0.25 or 0.50 mL). Furthermore, when comparing the treated birds (G4, G5) with the control birds, the Escherichia coli concentration in the drinking water containing synbiotics was significantly lower. In addition, treated chickens at (G7) showed a higher duodenum, ileum villus height (VH), and VH. - Ileum crypt depth (CD) ratio compared to other groups. In addition, birds treated with 0.50 mL of synbiotics in drinking water (G5) performed better in duodenum, ileum, CD and VH. - CD ratio than the other groups. Meanwhile, intestinal tract length and visceral pH did not differ significantly between groups. It can be concluded that the use of 0.25 mL of synbiotics in drinking water can improve the overall health of birds | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mandarah strain | |
| 650 | 4 | |a histological status | |
| 650 | 4 | |a intestinal bacterial count | |
| 650 | 4 | |a synbiotics | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Drinking Water |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Elsherbeni, Ahmed I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Almuraee, Areej A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nass, Nada M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Beyari, Eman A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alshammarii, Naheda M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Abdel-Ghany, Ahmed M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ahmed, El-Sayed G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nasr, Samia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Youssef, Khaled M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Salem, Heba M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Abd El-Hack, Mohamed E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Saber, Hamada S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Poultry science |d 1965 |g 103(2024), 5 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 103601 |w (DE-627)NLM000075736 |x 1525-3171 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:103 |g year:2024 |g number:5 |g day:29 |g month:04 |g pages:103601 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103601 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 103 |j 2024 |e 5 |b 29 |c 04 |h 103601 | ||