On the significance of the measurement evaluation method in decision making : A synthesis of JCGM 101 and JCGM 106 applied to gross alpha and gross beta measurements using LSC
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved..
In decision making, e.g. conformity to a specification like a reference value or a requirement, the decision rule applied shall be documented. Furthermore, if the measurement uncertainty is considered in the decision process the associated probability, or risk, that a measurement result is above (or below) a reference value shall be taken into account. In this work it is shown that for gross alpha and gross beta measurements the evaluation method, GUMUF (GUM Uncertainty Framework) or MC (Monte Carlo), may also be important and influence the decisions taken when measurement results are very close to the reference value. Therefore the evaluation method and assumptions of the input quantities may also be important to document. Moreover, decision makers or users of measurement results should be aware of possible differences and/or consequences due to the evaluation method regardless of the decision rule and the choice of evaluation method.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:208 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine - 208(2024) vom: 15. Apr., Seite 111282 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Ramebäck, H [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Conformity assessment |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 13.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111282 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369832515 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369832515 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240415232248.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240318s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111282 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1375.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369832515 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38493563 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0969-8043(24)00110-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ramebäck, H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the significance of the measurement evaluation method in decision making |b A synthesis of JCGM 101 and JCGM 106 applied to gross alpha and gross beta measurements using LSC |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 13.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a In decision making, e.g. conformity to a specification like a reference value or a requirement, the decision rule applied shall be documented. Furthermore, if the measurement uncertainty is considered in the decision process the associated probability, or risk, that a measurement result is above (or below) a reference value shall be taken into account. In this work it is shown that for gross alpha and gross beta measurements the evaluation method, GUMUF (GUM Uncertainty Framework) or MC (Monte Carlo), may also be important and influence the decisions taken when measurement results are very close to the reference value. Therefore the evaluation method and assumptions of the input quantities may also be important to document. Moreover, decision makers or users of measurement results should be aware of possible differences and/or consequences due to the evaluation method regardless of the decision rule and the choice of evaluation method | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conformity assessment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Decision making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a GUM | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gross alpha | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gross beta | |
| 650 | 4 | |a LSC | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liquid scintillation counting | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Monte Carlo | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Uncertainty modelling | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tovedal, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Norlin, K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine |d 1994 |g 208(2024) vom: 15. Apr., Seite 111282 |w (DE-627)NLM074730231 |x 1872-9800 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:208 |g year:2024 |g day:15 |g month:04 |g pages:111282 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111282 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 208 |j 2024 |b 15 |c 04 |h 111282 | ||