Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients : prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study
© 2024. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology..
BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablets (OST, which contains simethicone) and 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate (2 L-PEG/Asc) with a split-dosing regimen in older individuals aged ≥ 70 years who underwent scheduled colonoscopy.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter study was conducted between June 2022 and October 2023. Participants aged ≥ 70 years were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to the OST or 2 L-PEG/Asc groups.
RESULTS: In total, 254 patients were evaluated using a modified full analysis set. Successful overall bowel preparation was excellent and similar between the OST and 2 L-PEG/Asc groups for the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (96.5% vs. 96.6%) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS) (96.5% vs. 97.4%). The overall high-quality preparation rate was higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/Asc group (BBPS: 55.7% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001; HCS: 66.1% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001). The overall adenoma detection rate (54.8% vs. 35.3, P = 0.003) was superior in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/Asc group. Tolerability scores, including overall satisfaction, were generally higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/Asc group. The incidence of major solicited adverse events was comparable between the two groups (55.7% vs. 68.1, P = 0.051), and there were no clinically significant changes in the serum laboratory profiles on the day of or 7 days after colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: OST is an effective and safe low-volume agent for colonoscopy, with better tolerance than 2 L-PEG/Asc, in older individuals aged ≥ 70 years.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:59 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of gastroenterology - 59(2024), 5 vom: 19. Apr., Seite 402-410 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Kang, Ho Suk [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
3WJQ0SDW1A |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.04.2024 Date Revised 22.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369816870 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM369816870 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240422232234.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240317s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1383.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369816870 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38492010 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kang, Ho Suk |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients |b prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 22.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 22.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2024. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablets (OST, which contains simethicone) and 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate (2 L-PEG/Asc) with a split-dosing regimen in older individuals aged ≥ 70 years who underwent scheduled colonoscopy | ||
520 | |a METHODS: This prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter study was conducted between June 2022 and October 2023. Participants aged ≥ 70 years were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to the OST or 2 L-PEG/Asc groups | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: In total, 254 patients were evaluated using a modified full analysis set. Successful overall bowel preparation was excellent and similar between the OST and 2 L-PEG/Asc groups for the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (96.5% vs. 96.6%) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS) (96.5% vs. 97.4%). The overall high-quality preparation rate was higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/Asc group (BBPS: 55.7% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001; HCS: 66.1% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001). The overall adenoma detection rate (54.8% vs. 35.3, P = 0.003) was superior in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/Asc group. Tolerability scores, including overall satisfaction, were generally higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/Asc group. The incidence of major solicited adverse events was comparable between the two groups (55.7% vs. 68.1, P = 0.051), and there were no clinically significant changes in the serum laboratory profiles on the day of or 7 days after colonoscopy | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: OST is an effective and safe low-volume agent for colonoscopy, with better tolerance than 2 L-PEG/Asc, in older individuals aged ≥ 70 years | ||
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Aged | |
650 | 4 | |a Cathartics | |
650 | 4 | |a Colonoscopy | |
650 | 4 | |a Efficacy | |
650 | 4 | |a Safety | |
650 | 7 | |a Polyethylene Glycols |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 3WJQ0SDW1A |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Cathartics |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Sulfates |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Laxatives |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ascorbic Acid |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a PQ6CK8PD0R |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Na, Soo-Young |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yoon, Jin Young |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jung, Yunho |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Seo, Geom Seog |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cha, Jae Myung |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of gastroenterology |d 1994 |g 59(2024), 5 vom: 19. Apr., Seite 402-410 |w (DE-627)NLM074913832 |x 1435-5922 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2024 |g number:5 |g day:19 |g month:04 |g pages:402-410 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 59 |j 2024 |e 5 |b 19 |c 04 |h 402-410 |