The implementation of a perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery service : a qualitative case study
© 2024. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: The international scale and spread of evidence-based perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) services has not yet been fully realised. Implementation science provides a structured approach to understanding factors that act as barriers and facilitators to the implementation of POPS services. In this study, we aimed to identify factors that influence the implementation of POPS services in the UK.
METHODS: A qualitative case study at three UK health services was undertaken. The health services differed across contextual factors (population, workforce, size) and stages of POPS service implementation maturity. Semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled clinicians (perioperative medical, nursing, allied health, and pharmacy) and managers (n = 56) were conducted. Data were inductively coded, then thematically analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
RESULTS: Fourteen factors across all five CFIR domains were relevant to the implementation of POPS services. Key shared facilitators included stakeholders understanding the rationale of the POPS service, with support from their networks, POPS champions, and POPS clinical leads. We found substantial variation and flexibility in the way that health services responded to these shared facilitators and this was relevant to the implementation of POPS services.
CONCLUSIONS: Health services planning to implement a POPS service should use health service-specific strategies to respond flexibly to local factors that are acting as barriers or facilitators to implementation. To support implementation of a POPS service, we recommend health services prioritise understanding local networks, identifying POPS champions, and ensuring that stakeholders understand the rationale for the POPS service. Our study also provides a structure for future research to understand the factors associated with 'unsuccessful' implementation of a POPS service, which can inform ongoing efforts to implement evidence-based perioperative models of care for older people.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC health services research - 24(2024), 1 vom: 15. März, Seite 345 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Lodge, Margot E [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Implementation science |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 18.03.2024 Date Revised 19.03.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12913-024-10844-0 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369811100 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369811100 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240319233042.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240317s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12913-024-10844-0 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1336.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369811100 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38491431 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lodge, Margot E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The implementation of a perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery service |b a qualitative case study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 18.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 19.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The international scale and spread of evidence-based perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) services has not yet been fully realised. Implementation science provides a structured approach to understanding factors that act as barriers and facilitators to the implementation of POPS services. In this study, we aimed to identify factors that influence the implementation of POPS services in the UK | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: A qualitative case study at three UK health services was undertaken. The health services differed across contextual factors (population, workforce, size) and stages of POPS service implementation maturity. Semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled clinicians (perioperative medical, nursing, allied health, and pharmacy) and managers (n = 56) were conducted. Data were inductively coded, then thematically analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Fourteen factors across all five CFIR domains were relevant to the implementation of POPS services. Key shared facilitators included stakeholders understanding the rationale of the POPS service, with support from their networks, POPS champions, and POPS clinical leads. We found substantial variation and flexibility in the way that health services responded to these shared facilitators and this was relevant to the implementation of POPS services | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Health services planning to implement a POPS service should use health service-specific strategies to respond flexibly to local factors that are acting as barriers or facilitators to implementation. To support implementation of a POPS service, we recommend health services prioritise understanding local networks, identifying POPS champions, and ensuring that stakeholders understand the rationale for the POPS service. Our study also provides a structure for future research to understand the factors associated with 'unsuccessful' implementation of a POPS service, which can inform ongoing efforts to implement evidence-based perioperative models of care for older people | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Implementation science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Older people | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Perioperative care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Qualitative research | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dhesi, Jugdeep |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shipway, David Jh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Braude, Philip |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meilak, Catherine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Partridge, Judith |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Andrew, Nadine E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Srikanth, Velandai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ayton, Darshini R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Moran, Chris |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC health services research |d 2001 |g 24(2024), 1 vom: 15. März, Seite 345 |w (DE-627)NLM111682703 |x 1472-6963 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:15 |g month:03 |g pages:345 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10844-0 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 15 |c 03 |h 345 | ||