Understanding economic analysis and cost-effectiveness of CT scan-guided, 3-dimensional, robotic-arm assisted lower extremity arthroplasty : a systematic review
Aim: The overall goal of this review was to examine the cost-utility of robotic-arm assisted surgery versus manual surgery. Methods: We performed a systematic review of all health economic studies that compared CT-based robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty with manual techniques. The papers selected focused on various cost-utility measures. In addition, where appropriate, secondary aims encompassed various clinical outcomes (e.g., readmissions, discharges to subacute care, etc.). Only articles directly comparing CT-based robotic-arm assisted joint arthroplasty with manual joint arthroplasty were included, for a resulting total of 21 reports. Results: Almost all twenty-one studies demonstrated a positive effect of CT scan-guided robotic-assisted joint arthroplasty on health economic outcomes. For studies reporting on 90-day episodes of costs, 10 out of 12 found lower costs in the robotic-arm assisted groups. Conclusion: Robotic-arm assisted joint arthroplasty patients had shorter lengths of stay and cost savings based on their 90-day episodes of care, among other metrics. Payors would likely benefit from encouraging the use of this CT-based robotic technology.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of comparative effectiveness research - 13(2024), 4 vom: 24. Apr., Seite e230040 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Sarrel, Kara [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.03.2024 Date Revised 27.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.57264/cer-2023-0040 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369777387 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM369777387 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240427232140.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240315s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.57264/cer-2023-0040 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1390.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369777387 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38488048 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Sarrel, Kara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Understanding economic analysis and cost-effectiveness of CT scan-guided, 3-dimensional, robotic-arm assisted lower extremity arthroplasty |b a systematic review |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 25.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 27.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Aim: The overall goal of this review was to examine the cost-utility of robotic-arm assisted surgery versus manual surgery. Methods: We performed a systematic review of all health economic studies that compared CT-based robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty with manual techniques. The papers selected focused on various cost-utility measures. In addition, where appropriate, secondary aims encompassed various clinical outcomes (e.g., readmissions, discharges to subacute care, etc.). Only articles directly comparing CT-based robotic-arm assisted joint arthroplasty with manual joint arthroplasty were included, for a resulting total of 21 reports. Results: Almost all twenty-one studies demonstrated a positive effect of CT scan-guided robotic-assisted joint arthroplasty on health economic outcomes. For studies reporting on 90-day episodes of costs, 10 out of 12 found lower costs in the robotic-arm assisted groups. Conclusion: Robotic-arm assisted joint arthroplasty patients had shorter lengths of stay and cost savings based on their 90-day episodes of care, among other metrics. Payors would likely benefit from encouraging the use of this CT-based robotic technology | ||
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a 3-dimensional planning | |
650 | 4 | |a computed tomography | |
650 | 4 | |a cost savings | |
650 | 4 | |a cost–effectiveness | |
650 | 4 | |a economic advantages | |
650 | 4 | |a episodes of care | |
650 | 4 | |a health economics | |
650 | 4 | |a length of stay | |
650 | 4 | |a payors | |
650 | 4 | |a post-discharge period | |
650 | 4 | |a robotic-arm assisted joint arthroplasty | |
650 | 4 | |a total hip arthroplasty | |
650 | 4 | |a total knee arthroplasty | |
650 | 4 | |a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty | |
700 | 1 | |a Hameed, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dubin, Jeremy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mont, Michael A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jacofsky, David J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Coppolecchia, Andréa B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of comparative effectiveness research |d 2012 |g 13(2024), 4 vom: 24. Apr., Seite e230040 |w (DE-627)NLM218708033 |x 2042-6313 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g day:24 |g month:04 |g pages:e230040 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.57264/cer-2023-0040 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2024 |e 4 |b 24 |c 04 |h e230040 |