Comparison of Oxygen Delivery Devices in Postoperative Patients with Hypoxemia : An Open-labeled Randomized Controlled Study
Copyright © 2024; The Author(s)..
Background: Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is among the more commonly occurring complications in postoperative patients. Supplemental oxygen and addressing the primary etiology form the basis of its treatment.
Materials and methods: We conducted an open-labeled randomized control trial with 90 adult patients and compared three oxygen delivery vehicles (ODV), i.e., noninvasive ventilation (NIV), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), and venturi mask (VM) in postoperative hypoxemic patients. The primary outcome variable was a change in the P/F ratio after 2 hours of use of ODV.
Results: It was observed that the change in P/F ratio after 2 hours was similar in all three ODV groups (p = 0.274). The mean values of the post-ODV P/F ratio were comparable with the pre-ODV P/F ratio in all three modalities. The P/F ratio after HFNC was 358.08 ± 117.95; after NIV was 357.60 ± 220.67; and after VM was 355.47 ± 101.90 (p = 0.997).
Conclusion: Among HFNC, NIV, and VM, none of the devices proved superior to the other for use in postoperative hypoxemia.
How to cite this article: Mishra S, Kothari N, Sharma A, Goyal S, Rathod D, Meshram T, et al. Comparison of Oxygen Delivery Devices in Postoperative Patients with Hypoxemia: An Open-labeled Randomized Controlled Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):294-298.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:28 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine - 28(2024), 3 vom: 04. März, Seite 294-298 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Mishra, Susri [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Hypoxemia |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 14.03.2024 published: Print Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24659 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369667247 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369667247 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240315000021.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240313s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24659 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1329.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369667247 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38477006 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mishra, Susri |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Oxygen Delivery Devices in Postoperative Patients with Hypoxemia |b An Open-labeled Randomized Controlled Study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 14.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024; The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a Background: Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is among the more commonly occurring complications in postoperative patients. Supplemental oxygen and addressing the primary etiology form the basis of its treatment | ||
| 520 | |a Materials and methods: We conducted an open-labeled randomized control trial with 90 adult patients and compared three oxygen delivery vehicles (ODV), i.e., noninvasive ventilation (NIV), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), and venturi mask (VM) in postoperative hypoxemic patients. The primary outcome variable was a change in the P/F ratio after 2 hours of use of ODV | ||
| 520 | |a Results: It was observed that the change in P/F ratio after 2 hours was similar in all three ODV groups (p = 0.274). The mean values of the post-ODV P/F ratio were comparable with the pre-ODV P/F ratio in all three modalities. The P/F ratio after HFNC was 358.08 ± 117.95; after NIV was 357.60 ± 220.67; and after VM was 355.47 ± 101.90 (p = 0.997) | ||
| 520 | |a Conclusion: Among HFNC, NIV, and VM, none of the devices proved superior to the other for use in postoperative hypoxemia | ||
| 520 | |a How to cite this article: Mishra S, Kothari N, Sharma A, Goyal S, Rathod D, Meshram T, et al. Comparison of Oxygen Delivery Devices in Postoperative Patients with Hypoxemia: An Open-labeled Randomized Controlled Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):294-298 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hypoxemia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Oxygen delivery device | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Oxygenation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a P/F ratio | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kothari, Nikhil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sharma, Ankur |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Goyal, Shilpa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rathod, Darshna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meshram, Tanvi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bhatia, Pradeep |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine |d 2008 |g 28(2024), 3 vom: 04. März, Seite 294-298 |w (DE-627)NLM191247936 |x 0972-5229 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:04 |g month:03 |g pages:294-298 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24659 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 28 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 04 |c 03 |h 294-298 | ||