VEGF and Other Gene Therapies Improve Flap Survival-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies
Surgical flaps are basic tools in reconstructive surgery. Their use may be limited by ischemia and necrosis. Few therapies address or prevent them. Genetic therapy could improve flap outcomes, but primary studies in this field present conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the efficacy of external gene delivery to the flap for its survival in preclinical models. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359982). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to identify studies using animal models reporting flap survival outcomes following any genetic modifications. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate mean differences in flap survival with accompanying 95% CI. The risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to ascertain the robustness of primary analyses, and the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The initial search yielded 690 articles; 51 were eventually included, 36 of which with 1576 rats were meta-analyzed. VEGF gene delivery to different flap types significantly improved flap survival area by 15.66% (95% CI 11.80-19.52). Other interventions had smaller or less precise effects: PDGF-13.44% (95% CI 3.53-23.35); VEGF + FGF-8.64% (95% CI 6.94-10.34); HGF-5.61% (95% CI 0.43-10.78); FGF 3.84% (95% CI 1.13-6.55). Despite considerable heterogeneity, moderate risk of bias, and low quality of evidence, the efficacy of VEGF gene therapy remained significant in all sensitivity analyses. Preclinical data indicate that gene therapy is effective for increasing flap survival, but further animal studies are required for successful clinical translation.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:25 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International journal of molecular sciences - 25(2024), 5 vom: 23. Feb. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Paskal, Wiktor [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Animal models |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.03.2024 Date Revised 15.03.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/ijms25052622 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369635892 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369635892 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240315233803.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240313s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/ijms25052622 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1330.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369635892 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38473869 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)2622 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Paskal, Wiktor |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a VEGF and Other Gene Therapies Improve Flap Survival-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 14.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 15.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Surgical flaps are basic tools in reconstructive surgery. Their use may be limited by ischemia and necrosis. Few therapies address or prevent them. Genetic therapy could improve flap outcomes, but primary studies in this field present conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the efficacy of external gene delivery to the flap for its survival in preclinical models. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359982). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to identify studies using animal models reporting flap survival outcomes following any genetic modifications. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate mean differences in flap survival with accompanying 95% CI. The risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to ascertain the robustness of primary analyses, and the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The initial search yielded 690 articles; 51 were eventually included, 36 of which with 1576 rats were meta-analyzed. VEGF gene delivery to different flap types significantly improved flap survival area by 15.66% (95% CI 11.80-19.52). Other interventions had smaller or less precise effects: PDGF-13.44% (95% CI 3.53-23.35); VEGF + FGF-8.64% (95% CI 6.94-10.34); HGF-5.61% (95% CI 0.43-10.78); FGF 3.84% (95% CI 1.13-6.55). Despite considerable heterogeneity, moderate risk of bias, and low quality of evidence, the efficacy of VEGF gene therapy remained significant in all sensitivity analyses. Preclinical data indicate that gene therapy is effective for increasing flap survival, but further animal studies are required for successful clinical translation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a animal models | |
| 650 | 4 | |a gene therapy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a genetic vectors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a regenerative medicine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a surgical flaps | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gotowiec, Mateusz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stachura, Albert |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kopka, Michał |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Włodarski, Paweł |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of molecular sciences |d 2008 |g 25(2024), 5 vom: 23. Feb. |w (DE-627)NLM185552161 |x 1422-0067 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2024 |g number:5 |g day:23 |g month:02 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052622 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 2024 |e 5 |b 23 |c 02 | ||