Influence of donor age on liver transplantation outcomes : A multivariate analysis and comparative study
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: The growing disparity between the rising demand for liver transplantation (LT) and the limited availability of donor organs has prompted a greater reliance on older liver grafts. Traditionally, utilizing livers from elderly donors has been associated with outcomes inferior to those achieved with grafts from younger donors. By accounting for additional risk factors, we hypothesize that the utilization of older liver grafts has a relatively minor impact on both patient survival and graft viability.
AIM: To evaluate the impact of donor age on LT outcomes using multivariate analysis and comparing young and elderly donor groups.
METHODS: In the period from April 2013 to December 2018, 656 adult liver transplants were performed at the University Hospital Merkur. Several multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were developed to independently assess the significance of donor age. Donor age was treated as a continuous variable. The approach involved univariate and multivariate analysis, including variable selection and assessment of interactions and transformations. Additionally, to exemplify the similarity of using young and old donor liver grafts, the group of 87 recipients of elderly donor liver grafts (≥ 75 years) was compared to a group of 124 recipients of young liver grafts (≤ 45 years) from the dataset. Survival rates of the two groups were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to test the differences between groups.
RESULTS: Using multivariate Cox analysis, we found no statistical significance in the role of donor age within the constructed models. Even when retained during the entire model development, the donor age's impact on survival remained insignificant and transformations and interactions yielded no substantial effects on survival. Consistent insignificance and low coefficient values suggest that donor age does not impact patient survival in our dataset. Notably, there was no statistical evidence that the five developed models did not adhere to the proportional hazards assumption. When comparing donor age groups, transplantation using elderly grafts showed similar early graft function, similar graft (P = 0.92), and patient survival rates (P = 0.86), and no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: Our center's experience indicates that donor age does not play a significant role in patient survival, with elderly livers performing comparably to younger grafts when accounting for other risk factors.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
World journal of gastrointestinal surgery - 16(2024), 2 vom: 27. Feb., Seite 331-344 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Bezjak, Miran [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Cox proportional hazard models |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 12.03.2024 published: Print Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.331 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369530764 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369530764 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240312234257.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240311s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.331 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1324.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369530764 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38463351 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bezjak, Miran |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Influence of donor age on liver transplantation outcomes |b A multivariate analysis and comparative study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 12.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The growing disparity between the rising demand for liver transplantation (LT) and the limited availability of donor organs has prompted a greater reliance on older liver grafts. Traditionally, utilizing livers from elderly donors has been associated with outcomes inferior to those achieved with grafts from younger donors. By accounting for additional risk factors, we hypothesize that the utilization of older liver grafts has a relatively minor impact on both patient survival and graft viability | ||
| 520 | |a AIM: To evaluate the impact of donor age on LT outcomes using multivariate analysis and comparing young and elderly donor groups | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: In the period from April 2013 to December 2018, 656 adult liver transplants were performed at the University Hospital Merkur. Several multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were developed to independently assess the significance of donor age. Donor age was treated as a continuous variable. The approach involved univariate and multivariate analysis, including variable selection and assessment of interactions and transformations. Additionally, to exemplify the similarity of using young and old donor liver grafts, the group of 87 recipients of elderly donor liver grafts (≥ 75 years) was compared to a group of 124 recipients of young liver grafts (≤ 45 years) from the dataset. Survival rates of the two groups were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to test the differences between groups | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Using multivariate Cox analysis, we found no statistical significance in the role of donor age within the constructed models. Even when retained during the entire model development, the donor age's impact on survival remained insignificant and transformations and interactions yielded no substantial effects on survival. Consistent insignificance and low coefficient values suggest that donor age does not impact patient survival in our dataset. Notably, there was no statistical evidence that the five developed models did not adhere to the proportional hazards assumption. When comparing donor age groups, transplantation using elderly grafts showed similar early graft function, similar graft (P = 0.92), and patient survival rates (P = 0.86), and no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Our center's experience indicates that donor age does not play a significant role in patient survival, with elderly livers performing comparably to younger grafts when accounting for other risk factors | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cox proportional hazard models | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Elderly donors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liver transplantation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Postoperative complications | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Survival analysis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stresec, Ivan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kocman, Branislav |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jadrijević, Stipislav |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Filipec Kanizaj, Tajana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Antonijević, Miro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dalbelo Bašić, Bojana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mikulić, Danko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t World journal of gastrointestinal surgery |d 2009 |g 16(2024), 2 vom: 27. Feb., Seite 331-344 |w (DE-627)NLM204377447 |x 1948-9366 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:27 |g month:02 |g pages:331-344 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.331 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 27 |c 02 |h 331-344 | ||