Effect of passive versus active abdominal drainage on wound infection after pancreatectomy : A meta-analysis
© 2024 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
Following pancreatic resection, there may be a variety of complications, including wound infection, haemorrhage, and abdominal infection. The placement of drainage channels during operation may decrease the chances of postoperative complications. However, what kind of drainage can decrease the rate of postoperative complications is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of both active and passive drainage for post-operation wound complications. From the beginning of the database until November 2023, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Pubmed database have been searched. The two authors collected 2524 related studies from 3 data bases for importation into Endnote software, and 8 finished trials were screened against the exclusion criteria. Passive drainage can decrease the incidence of superficial wound infection in postoperative patients with pancreas operation (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.60 p = 0.01); No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of deep infections among the two groups (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.68-3.36 p = 0.31); No statistical significance was found for the rate of haemorrhage after active drainage on the pancreas compared with that of passive drainage (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.77 p = 0.47); No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of death after operation for patients who had received a pancreas operation in active or passive drainage (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.57-1.42 p = 0.65); On the basis of existing evidence, the use of passive abdominal drainage reduces postoperative surface wound infections in patients. But there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of severe complications, haemorrhage after surgery, or mortality. However, because of the limited sample size of this meta-analysis, it is necessary to have more high-quality research with a large sample size to confirm the findings.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:21 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
International wound journal - 21(2024), 3 vom: 06. März, Seite e14755 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Han, Yanchun [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Active suction (AS) |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.03.2024 Date Revised 04.04.2024 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/iwj.14755 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369429109 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM369429109 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240405233745.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240308s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/iwj.14755 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1366.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369429109 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38453160 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Han, Yanchun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of passive versus active abdominal drainage on wound infection after pancreatectomy |b A meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 11.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 04.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2024 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
520 | |a Following pancreatic resection, there may be a variety of complications, including wound infection, haemorrhage, and abdominal infection. The placement of drainage channels during operation may decrease the chances of postoperative complications. However, what kind of drainage can decrease the rate of postoperative complications is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of both active and passive drainage for post-operation wound complications. From the beginning of the database until November 2023, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Pubmed database have been searched. The two authors collected 2524 related studies from 3 data bases for importation into Endnote software, and 8 finished trials were screened against the exclusion criteria. Passive drainage can decrease the incidence of superficial wound infection in postoperative patients with pancreas operation (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.60 p = 0.01); No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of deep infections among the two groups (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.68-3.36 p = 0.31); No statistical significance was found for the rate of haemorrhage after active drainage on the pancreas compared with that of passive drainage (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.77 p = 0.47); No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of death after operation for patients who had received a pancreas operation in active or passive drainage (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.57-1.42 p = 0.65); On the basis of existing evidence, the use of passive abdominal drainage reduces postoperative surface wound infections in patients. But there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of severe complications, haemorrhage after surgery, or mortality. However, because of the limited sample size of this meta-analysis, it is necessary to have more high-quality research with a large sample size to confirm the findings | ||
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a active suction (AS) | |
650 | 4 | |a deep infection | |
650 | 4 | |a pancreatic resection | |
650 | 4 | |a passive gravity (PG) | |
650 | 4 | |a superficial wound infection | |
700 | 1 | |a Wu, Zuowei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Song, Jiafan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Qiang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wei, Lijuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lu, Huimin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International wound journal |d 2004 |g 21(2024), 3 vom: 06. März, Seite e14755 |w (DE-627)NLM162044909 |x 1742-481X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:06 |g month:03 |g pages:e14755 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14755 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 21 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 06 |c 03 |h e14755 |