Are multiple projections necessary when assessing umbilical venous catheter placement in neonates? A retrospective study
© 2024 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists..
INTRODUCTION: There is variability in clinical practice regarding the number of radiographic views required to accurately determine umbilical venous catheter (UVC) tip position. Some units prefer performing a single anteroposterior (AP) view and others do both AP and lateral views. The aim of this study was to compare the need for one versus two radiographical views to accurately determine UVC tip position.
METHODS: Radiographs of 382 infants (all gestations) from two level six neonatal units were included in the study. Patients with congenital anomalies and those who had adjustment of UVC position between AP and lateral films being performed were excluded. Six clinicians reviewed anonymized AP only images and documented UVC tip position. Subsequently, they reviewed both AP and lateral views and again documented the UVC tip position. Results were compared to the expert consensus which was taken from the consensus of two paediatric radiologists.
RESULTS: The study population had a mean gestational age of 32.8 weeks and birth weight of 2190 g, with 58% males. The UVC tip positions were accurately determined 76% times by the AP view alone and 82% times by using both the AP and lateral views (P < 0.001). The low placed UVC tip position which is the most inappropriate for use was more accurately determined by two images (78% times) rather than single image (70% times) (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Utilising both AP and lateral views was superior in accurately determining UVC tip position to AP view alone.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:68 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology - 68(2024), 3 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 243-249 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Yeoh, Melanie [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Catheterization, central venous |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.04.2024 Date Revised 25.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1111/1754-9485.13632 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM36940713X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM36940713X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240426233841.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240307s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/1754-9485.13632 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1388.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM36940713X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38450951 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yeoh, Melanie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Are multiple projections necessary when assessing umbilical venous catheter placement in neonates? A retrospective study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 25.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: There is variability in clinical practice regarding the number of radiographic views required to accurately determine umbilical venous catheter (UVC) tip position. Some units prefer performing a single anteroposterior (AP) view and others do both AP and lateral views. The aim of this study was to compare the need for one versus two radiographical views to accurately determine UVC tip position | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Radiographs of 382 infants (all gestations) from two level six neonatal units were included in the study. Patients with congenital anomalies and those who had adjustment of UVC position between AP and lateral films being performed were excluded. Six clinicians reviewed anonymized AP only images and documented UVC tip position. Subsequently, they reviewed both AP and lateral views and again documented the UVC tip position. Results were compared to the expert consensus which was taken from the consensus of two paediatric radiologists | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The study population had a mean gestational age of 32.8 weeks and birth weight of 2190 g, with 58% males. The UVC tip positions were accurately determined 76% times by the AP view alone and 82% times by using both the AP and lateral views (P < 0.001). The low placed UVC tip position which is the most inappropriate for use was more accurately determined by two images (78% times) rather than single image (70% times) (P < 0.001) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Utilising both AP and lateral views was superior in accurately determining UVC tip position to AP view alone | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a catheterization, central venous | |
| 650 | 4 | |a infant, newborn | |
| 650 | 4 | |a intensive care units, neonatal | |
| 650 | 4 | |a radiography | |
| 650 | 4 | |a umbilical veins/diagnostic imaging* | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Erickson, Jonathan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Desai, Saumil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hazeldine, Beth |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thomas, Rebecca |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gibson, Craig |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Powers, Neil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Falkner, Nathalie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology |d 2008 |g 68(2024), 3 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 243-249 |w (DE-627)NLM178559407 |x 1754-9485 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:68 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:04 |g pages:243-249 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13632 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 68 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 01 |c 04 |h 243-249 | ||