Patient decision-making in the era of transcarotid artery revascularization
Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: The National Coverage Determination on carotid stenting by Medicare in October 2023 stipulates that patients participate in a shared decision-making (SDM) conversation with their proceduralist before an intervention. However, to date, there is no validated SDM tool that incorporates transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) into its decision platform. Our objective was to elicit patient and surgeon experiences and preferences through a qualitative approach to better inform the SDM process surrounding carotid revascularization.
METHODS: We performed longitudinal perioperative semistructured interviews of 20 participants using purposive maximum variation sampling, a qualitative technique designed for identification and selection of information-rich cases, to define domains important to participants undergoing carotid endarterectomy or TCAR and impressions of SDM. We also performed interviews with nine vascular surgeons to elicit their input on the SDM process surrounding carotid revascularization. Interview data were coded and analyzed using inductive content analysis coding.
RESULTS: We identified three important domains that contribute to the participants' ultimate decision on which procedure to choose: their individual values, their understanding of the disease and each procedure, and how they prefer to make medical decisions. Participant values included themes such as success rates, "wanting to feel better," and the proceduralist's experience. Participants varied in their desired degree of understanding of carotid disease, but all individuals wished to discuss each option with their proceduralist. Participants' desired medical decision-making style varied on a spectrum from complete autonomy to wanting the proceduralist to make the decision for them. Participants who preferred carotid endarterectomy felt outcomes were superior to TCAR and often expressed a desire to eliminate the carotid plaque. Those selecting TCAR felt it was a newer, less invasive option with the shortest procedural and recovery times. Surgeons frequently noted patient factors such as age and anatomy, as well as the availability of long-term data, as reasons to preferentially select one procedure. For most participants, their surgeon was viewed as the most important source of information surrounding their disease and procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: SDM surrounding carotid revascularization is nuanced and marked by variation in patient preferences surrounding autonomy when choosing treatment. Given the mandate by Medicare to participate in a SDM interaction before carotid stenting, this analysis offers critical insights that can help to guide an efficient and effective dialog between patients and providers to arrive at a shared decision surrounding therapeutic intervention for patients with carotid disease.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of vascular surgery - (2024) vom: 05. März |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Krafcik, Brianna M [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Carotid disease |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 07.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.035 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369373863 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369373863 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240408232552.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240307s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.035 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1369.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369373863 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38447624 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0741-5214(24)00412-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Krafcik, Brianna M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Patient decision-making in the era of transcarotid artery revascularization |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 07.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: The National Coverage Determination on carotid stenting by Medicare in October 2023 stipulates that patients participate in a shared decision-making (SDM) conversation with their proceduralist before an intervention. However, to date, there is no validated SDM tool that incorporates transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) into its decision platform. Our objective was to elicit patient and surgeon experiences and preferences through a qualitative approach to better inform the SDM process surrounding carotid revascularization | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: We performed longitudinal perioperative semistructured interviews of 20 participants using purposive maximum variation sampling, a qualitative technique designed for identification and selection of information-rich cases, to define domains important to participants undergoing carotid endarterectomy or TCAR and impressions of SDM. We also performed interviews with nine vascular surgeons to elicit their input on the SDM process surrounding carotid revascularization. Interview data were coded and analyzed using inductive content analysis coding | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: We identified three important domains that contribute to the participants' ultimate decision on which procedure to choose: their individual values, their understanding of the disease and each procedure, and how they prefer to make medical decisions. Participant values included themes such as success rates, "wanting to feel better," and the proceduralist's experience. Participants varied in their desired degree of understanding of carotid disease, but all individuals wished to discuss each option with their proceduralist. Participants' desired medical decision-making style varied on a spectrum from complete autonomy to wanting the proceduralist to make the decision for them. Participants who preferred carotid endarterectomy felt outcomes were superior to TCAR and often expressed a desire to eliminate the carotid plaque. Those selecting TCAR felt it was a newer, less invasive option with the shortest procedural and recovery times. Surgeons frequently noted patient factors such as age and anatomy, as well as the availability of long-term data, as reasons to preferentially select one procedure. For most participants, their surgeon was viewed as the most important source of information surrounding their disease and procedure | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: SDM surrounding carotid revascularization is nuanced and marked by variation in patient preferences surrounding autonomy when choosing treatment. Given the mandate by Medicare to participate in a SDM interaction before carotid stenting, this analysis offers critical insights that can help to guide an efficient and effective dialog between patients and providers to arrive at a shared decision surrounding therapeutic intervention for patients with carotid disease | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Carotid disease | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Carotid endarterectomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Shared decision-making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Transcarotid artery revascularization | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stone, David H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scali, Salvatore T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cai, Ming |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jarmel, Isabel A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hicks, Caitlin W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Goodney, Philip P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Columbo, Jesse A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of vascular surgery |d 1987 |g (2024) vom: 05. März |w (DE-627)NLM012713147 |x 1097-6809 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:05 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.035 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 05 |c 03 | ||