Rheumatology High Blood Pressure Protocol Reduces Disparities, But Delays Remain for External Primary Care
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To address high blood pressure (BP) in rheumatology patients, we previously implemented BP Connect, a brief staff-driven protocol to address high BP. Although timely follow-up and hypertension rates improved for patients with in-system primary care (PC), many receive PC and rheumatology care in separate health systems. In this cohort study, we compared rates of timely PC follow-up for high BP across-system health maintenance organizations (HMOs) before and after BP Connect implementation.
METHODS: All adult patients with high rheumatology clinic BP and PC in that HMO were eligible. BP Connect's protocol engaged the staff in remeasuring high BP (≥140/90 mm Hg), advising cardiovascular disease risk, and connecting timely PC follow-up, which for patients with PC across system includes written follow-up instructions. After an eligible rheumatology visit, the next HMO PC visit with BP was used to determine rates and odds of timely follow-up before and after using multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: Across 1327 rheumatology visits with high BP and across-system PC (2013-2019), 951 occurred after 2015 BP Connect implementation; 400 had confirmed high BP. Primary care follow-up rose from 20.5% to 23.5%. The odds of timely PC BP follow-up insignificantly changed (odds ratio, 1.19; confidence interval, 0.85-1.68). For visits with Black patients, the odds of timely follow-up did significantly increase (1.95; confidence interval, 1.02-3.79).
CONCLUSIONS: Timely follow-up for Black patients did improve, highlighting protocol interventions for more equitable health care. In contrast to our prior in-system study, BP Connect did not significantly improve follow-up with an across-system PC, indicating a need for direct scheduling. Future directions include piloting direct across-system scheduling.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases - (2024) vom: 05. März |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Ferguson, Sancia [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 02.05.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
---|
doi: |
10.1097/RHU.0000000000002065 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369363272 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM369363272 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240503000324.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240306s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/RHU.0000000000002065 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1395.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369363272 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38446494 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ferguson, Sancia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rheumatology High Blood Pressure Protocol Reduces Disparities, But Delays Remain for External Primary Care |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 02.05.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To address high blood pressure (BP) in rheumatology patients, we previously implemented BP Connect, a brief staff-driven protocol to address high BP. Although timely follow-up and hypertension rates improved for patients with in-system primary care (PC), many receive PC and rheumatology care in separate health systems. In this cohort study, we compared rates of timely PC follow-up for high BP across-system health maintenance organizations (HMOs) before and after BP Connect implementation | ||
520 | |a METHODS: All adult patients with high rheumatology clinic BP and PC in that HMO were eligible. BP Connect's protocol engaged the staff in remeasuring high BP (≥140/90 mm Hg), advising cardiovascular disease risk, and connecting timely PC follow-up, which for patients with PC across system includes written follow-up instructions. After an eligible rheumatology visit, the next HMO PC visit with BP was used to determine rates and odds of timely follow-up before and after using multivariable logistic regression | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Across 1327 rheumatology visits with high BP and across-system PC (2013-2019), 951 occurred after 2015 BP Connect implementation; 400 had confirmed high BP. Primary care follow-up rose from 20.5% to 23.5%. The odds of timely PC BP follow-up insignificantly changed (odds ratio, 1.19; confidence interval, 0.85-1.68). For visits with Black patients, the odds of timely follow-up did significantly increase (1.95; confidence interval, 1.02-3.79) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Timely follow-up for Black patients did improve, highlighting protocol interventions for more equitable health care. In contrast to our prior in-system study, BP Connect did not significantly improve follow-up with an across-system PC, indicating a need for direct scheduling. Future directions include piloting direct across-system scheduling | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Hanlon, Bret M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ramly, Edmond |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Messina, Monica L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ibrahim, Jennifer |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rake, Paul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bartels, Christie M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases |d 1995 |g (2024) vom: 05. März |w (DE-627)NLM094595941 |x 1536-7355 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:05 |g month:03 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002065 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2024 |b 05 |c 03 |