Rapid Review of Therapy Protocols for Public Health Emergencies
© 2024 by The Hastings Center. All rights reserved..
How research during a public health emergency is conducted is recognized as essential to the public health response to that emergency. Such research needs to undergo substantive and meaningful ethical review in a timely manner. Rapid ethical review may be accomplished through a number of mechanisms, including use of local rapid-response institutional review boards (IRBs). We describe use of such a model in the setting of the 2014 Ebola virus disease epidemic and the Rapid-Response IRB's subsequent transition to a multisite single IRB model during the current Covid-19 pandemic. The rapid-response review model is characterized by a small IRB with extensive use of alternate members with specific expertise and by close collaboration with the investigator in an iterative process.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:46 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Ethics & human research - 46(2024), 2 vom: 22. März, Seite 16-21 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Gordon, Bruce G [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Ebola |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 07.03.2024 Date Revised 07.03.2024 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1002/eahr.500203 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369359380 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM369359380 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240307232759.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240306s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/eahr.500203 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1319.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369359380 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38446100 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gordon, Bruce G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rapid Review of Therapy Protocols for Public Health Emergencies |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 07.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2024 by The Hastings Center. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a How research during a public health emergency is conducted is recognized as essential to the public health response to that emergency. Such research needs to undergo substantive and meaningful ethical review in a timely manner. Rapid ethical review may be accomplished through a number of mechanisms, including use of local rapid-response institutional review boards (IRBs). We describe use of such a model in the setting of the 2014 Ebola virus disease epidemic and the Rapid-Response IRB's subsequent transition to a multisite single IRB model during the current Covid-19 pandemic. The rapid-response review model is characterized by a small IRB with extensive use of alternate members with specific expertise and by close collaboration with the investigator in an iterative process | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Ebola | |
650 | 4 | |a human subjects research | |
650 | 4 | |a institutional review board (IRB) | |
650 | 4 | |a local rapid-response institutional review board | |
650 | 4 | |a public health emergency | |
650 | 4 | |a single IRB (sIRB) | |
700 | 1 | |a Lowe, Abigail E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kratochvil, Christopher J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethics & human research |d 2019 |g 46(2024), 2 vom: 22. März, Seite 16-21 |w (DE-627)NLM293701296 |x 2578-2363 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:22 |g month:03 |g pages:16-21 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500203 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 46 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 22 |c 03 |h 16-21 |