The Impact of Intracranial Pressure Telesensors : An Observational Propensity-Matched Control Analysis of Service Demand and Costs
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons..
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Implantable telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) sensors (telesensors) enable routine, noninvasive ICP feedback, aiding clinical decision-making and attribution of pressure-related symptoms in patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunt systems. Here, we aim to explore the impact of these devices on service demand and costs in patients with adult hydrocephalus.
METHODS: We performed an observational propensity-matched control study, comparing patients who had an MScio/Sensor Reservoir (Christoph Miethke, GmbH & Co) against those with a nontelemetric reservoir inserted between March 2016 and March 2018. Patients were matched on demographics, diagnosis, shunt-type, and revision status. Service usage was recorded with frequencies of neurosurgical admissions, outpatient clinics, scans, and further surgical procedures in the 2 years before and after shunt insertion.
RESULTS: In total, 136 patients, 73 telesensors, and 63 controls were included in this study (48 matched pairs). Telesensor use led to a significant decrease in neurosurgical inpatient admissions, radiographic encounters, and procedures including ICP monitoring. After multivariate adjustment, the mean cumulative saving after 2 years was £5236 ($6338) in telesensor patients (£5498 on matched pair analysis). On break-even analysis, cost-savings were likely to be achieved within 8 months of clinical use, postimplantation. Telesensor patients also experienced a significant reduction in imaging-associated radiation (4 mSv) over 2 years.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this exploratory study reveal that telesensor implantation is associated with reduced service demand and provides net financial savings from an institutional perspective. Moreover, telesensor patients required fewer appointments, invasive procedures, and had less radiation exposure, indicating an improvement in both their experience and safety.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Neurosurgery - (2024) vom: 06. März |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Pandit, Anand S [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 06.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1227/neu.0000000000002893 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369357353 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369357353 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240306233759.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240306s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1227/neu.0000000000002893 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1318.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369357353 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38445908 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pandit, Anand S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Impact of Intracranial Pressure Telesensors |b An Observational Propensity-Matched Control Analysis of Service Demand and Costs |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 06.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Implantable telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) sensors (telesensors) enable routine, noninvasive ICP feedback, aiding clinical decision-making and attribution of pressure-related symptoms in patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunt systems. Here, we aim to explore the impact of these devices on service demand and costs in patients with adult hydrocephalus | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: We performed an observational propensity-matched control study, comparing patients who had an MScio/Sensor Reservoir (Christoph Miethke, GmbH & Co) against those with a nontelemetric reservoir inserted between March 2016 and March 2018. Patients were matched on demographics, diagnosis, shunt-type, and revision status. Service usage was recorded with frequencies of neurosurgical admissions, outpatient clinics, scans, and further surgical procedures in the 2 years before and after shunt insertion | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: In total, 136 patients, 73 telesensors, and 63 controls were included in this study (48 matched pairs). Telesensor use led to a significant decrease in neurosurgical inpatient admissions, radiographic encounters, and procedures including ICP monitoring. After multivariate adjustment, the mean cumulative saving after 2 years was £5236 ($6338) in telesensor patients (£5498 on matched pair analysis). On break-even analysis, cost-savings were likely to be achieved within 8 months of clinical use, postimplantation. Telesensor patients also experienced a significant reduction in imaging-associated radiation (4 mSv) over 2 years | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The findings of this exploratory study reveal that telesensor implantation is associated with reduced service demand and provides net financial savings from an institutional perspective. Moreover, telesensor patients required fewer appointments, invasive procedures, and had less radiation exposure, indicating an improvement in both their experience and safety | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kamal, Muhammad A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Reischer, Gerda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aldabbagh, Yousif |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alradhawi, Mohammad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Faith M Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sekhon, Priya P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Moncur, Eleanor M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Banks, Ptolemy D W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thompson, Simon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thorne, Lewis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Watkins, Laurence D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Toma, Ahmed K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Neurosurgery |d 1993 |g (2024) vom: 06. März |w (DE-627)NLM000294977 |x 1524-4040 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:06 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002893 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 06 |c 03 | ||