Adjudications and tinkering with care for socially vulnerable patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the mechanisms at play in the adjudications made by professionals and socially vulnerable patients with type 2 diabetes about their eligibility for care.
DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: The study included 14 patients and 10 health professionals in seven general practice surgeries in deprived areas in Greater Copenhagen. The study data consist of 17 semi-structured interviews with patients and 22 with health professionals immediately after observation of 23 consultations. Our analytical approach was inspired by Systematic Text Condensation and the concept of 'candidacy' for access to health care.
RESULTS: Adjudications of patients not being candidates for services were common, but we also found that both patients and health professionals worked to align the services to the needs of the patients. This could include using services differently than was intended by the providers or by changing routines to make it easier for patients to use the services. We discuss these processes as 'tinkering'. This usually implies that the best individual solution for the patient is aimed for, and in this study, the best solution sometimes meant not focusing on diabetes.
CONCLUSION: The study adds to existing knowledge about access to services for socially vulnerable patients by demonstrating that both patients and professionals in general practice engage in tinkering processes to make services work.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:42 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Scandinavian journal of primary health care - 42(2024), 2 vom: 25. Apr., Seite 295-303 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Guassora, Ann Dorrit [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Candidacy |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 10.04.2024 Date Revised 11.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1080/02813432.2024.2317825 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369268938 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369268938 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240411232411.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240305s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/02813432.2024.2317825 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1372.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369268938 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38437026 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Guassora, Ann Dorrit |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Adjudications and tinkering with care for socially vulnerable patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 10.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 11.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To analyse the mechanisms at play in the adjudications made by professionals and socially vulnerable patients with type 2 diabetes about their eligibility for care | ||
| 520 | |a DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: The study included 14 patients and 10 health professionals in seven general practice surgeries in deprived areas in Greater Copenhagen. The study data consist of 17 semi-structured interviews with patients and 22 with health professionals immediately after observation of 23 consultations. Our analytical approach was inspired by Systematic Text Condensation and the concept of 'candidacy' for access to health care | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Adjudications of patients not being candidates for services were common, but we also found that both patients and health professionals worked to align the services to the needs of the patients. This could include using services differently than was intended by the providers or by changing routines to make it easier for patients to use the services. We discuss these processes as 'tinkering'. This usually implies that the best individual solution for the patient is aimed for, and in this study, the best solution sometimes meant not focusing on diabetes | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The study adds to existing knowledge about access to services for socially vulnerable patients by demonstrating that both patients and professionals in general practice engage in tinkering processes to make services work | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health inequities | |
| 650 | 4 | |a candidacy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a family practice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a general practice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a health services accessibility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a socioeconomic factors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a tinkering | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tvistholm, Nina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kofod, Frida Greek |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a A Rogvi, Sofie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wind, Gitte |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Christensen, Ulla |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scandinavian journal of primary health care |d 1993 |g 42(2024), 2 vom: 25. Apr., Seite 295-303 |w (DE-627)NLM013266128 |x 1502-7724 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:25 |g month:04 |g pages:295-303 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2317825 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 42 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 25 |c 04 |h 295-303 | ||