Comparison of prophylaxis strategy for postoperative nausea and vomiting and its incidence before and after the implementation of 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 in surgical setting : a single-center, retrospective study
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists..
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between adherence to guideline-recommended risk-based postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis, the antiemetics used for PONV prophylaxis, and the incidence of PONV in patients who were underwent general anesthesia before and after 5-HT3 receptor antagonists became available.
METHODS: Patients (≥ 20 years old) who were extubated after scheduled surgery and returned to general wards between January 2021 and February 2022 and between June 2022 and July 2023 were included. Risk factors included age < 50, female, motion sickness, nonsmoker, surgical factors, and postoperative opioid use. Two and three or more prophylaxis were recommended for patients with one or two and three or more risk factors, respectively. The primary outcome was the number of patients who received adequate prophylaxis, and the secondary outcomes were antiemetic agents used during anesthesia and the incidence of PONV on postoperative days 0 and 1. PONV was defined as documented PONV or rescue antiemetic administration.
RESULTS: From January 2021 to February 2022 and from June 2022 to July 2023, 2342 and 2682 patients were included, respectively. Before ondansetron became available, more D2 receptor antagonists were used (p < 0.001), and after ondansetron became available, both ondansetron (p < 0.001) and propofol (p < 0.001) were given more frequently. Before and after ondansetron became available, the number of patients with adequate prophylaxis was 3.7% and 9.2%, respectively (p < 0.001), and the incidence of PONV on postoperative days 0 and 1 was 44.6% and 44.0%, respectively (p = 0.67).
CONCLUSION: The availability of ondansetron increased the number of patients with adequate PONV prophylaxis, but did not decrease the incidence of PONV.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of anesthesia - (2024) vom: 04. März |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Hirai, Sayaka [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Anesthesia |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 04.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00540-024-03327-3 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369266374 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM369266374 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240304233535.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240304s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00540-024-03327-3 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1316.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369266374 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38436772 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hirai, Sayaka |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of prophylaxis strategy for postoperative nausea and vomiting and its incidence before and after the implementation of 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 in surgical setting |b a single-center, retrospective study |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 04.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: To investigate the association between adherence to guideline-recommended risk-based postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis, the antiemetics used for PONV prophylaxis, and the incidence of PONV in patients who were underwent general anesthesia before and after 5-HT3 receptor antagonists became available | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Patients (≥ 20 years old) who were extubated after scheduled surgery and returned to general wards between January 2021 and February 2022 and between June 2022 and July 2023 were included. Risk factors included age < 50, female, motion sickness, nonsmoker, surgical factors, and postoperative opioid use. Two and three or more prophylaxis were recommended for patients with one or two and three or more risk factors, respectively. The primary outcome was the number of patients who received adequate prophylaxis, and the secondary outcomes were antiemetic agents used during anesthesia and the incidence of PONV on postoperative days 0 and 1. PONV was defined as documented PONV or rescue antiemetic administration | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: From January 2021 to February 2022 and from June 2022 to July 2023, 2342 and 2682 patients were included, respectively. Before ondansetron became available, more D2 receptor antagonists were used (p < 0.001), and after ondansetron became available, both ondansetron (p < 0.001) and propofol (p < 0.001) were given more frequently. Before and after ondansetron became available, the number of patients with adequate prophylaxis was 3.7% and 9.2%, respectively (p < 0.001), and the incidence of PONV on postoperative days 0 and 1 was 44.6% and 44.0%, respectively (p = 0.67) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The availability of ondansetron increased the number of patients with adequate PONV prophylaxis, but did not decrease the incidence of PONV | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Anesthesia | |
650 | 4 | |a General | |
650 | 4 | |a Postoperative nausea and vomiting | |
650 | 4 | |a Serotonin antagonists | |
700 | 1 | |a Ida, Mitsuru |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kawaguchi, Masahiko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of anesthesia |d 1987 |g (2024) vom: 04. März |w (DE-627)NLM088729141 |x 1438-8359 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:04 |g month:03 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03327-3 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2024 |b 04 |c 03 |