Clinical care standards for the management of low back pain : a scoping review
© 2024. The Author(s)..
The objective of this study is to compare and contrast the quality statements and quality indicators across clinical care standards for low back pain. Searches were performed in Medline, guideline databases, and Google searches to identify clinical care standards for the management of low back pain targeting a multidisciplinary audience. Two independent reviewers reviewed the search results and extracted relevant information from the clinical care standards. We compared the quality statements and indicators of the clinical care standards to identify the consistent messages and the discrepancies between them. Three national clinical care standards from Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom were included. They provided from 6 to 8 quality statements and from 12 to 18 quality indicators. The three standards provide consistent recommendations in the quality statements related to imaging, and patient education/advice and self-management. In addition, the Canadian and Australian standards also provide consistent recommendations regarding comprehensive assessment, psychological support, and review and patient referral. However, the three clinical care standards differ in the statements related to psychological assessment, opioid analgesics, non-opioid analgesics, and non-pharmacological therapies. The three national clinical care standards provide consistent recommendations on imaging and patient education/advice, self-management of the condition, and two standards (Canadian and Australian) agree on recommendations regarding comprehensive assessment, psychological support, and review and patient referral. The standards differ in the quality statements related to psychological assessment, opioid prescription, non-opioid analgesics, and non-pharmacological therapies.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Rheumatology international - (2024) vom: 29. Feb. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Alves, Gabriel S [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Clinical care standards |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 29.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s00296-024-05543-2 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369113489 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369113489 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240301000314.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240301s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00296-024-05543-2 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1312.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369113489 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38421427 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Alves, Gabriel S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clinical care standards for the management of low back pain |b a scoping review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 29.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a The objective of this study is to compare and contrast the quality statements and quality indicators across clinical care standards for low back pain. Searches were performed in Medline, guideline databases, and Google searches to identify clinical care standards for the management of low back pain targeting a multidisciplinary audience. Two independent reviewers reviewed the search results and extracted relevant information from the clinical care standards. We compared the quality statements and indicators of the clinical care standards to identify the consistent messages and the discrepancies between them. Three national clinical care standards from Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom were included. They provided from 6 to 8 quality statements and from 12 to 18 quality indicators. The three standards provide consistent recommendations in the quality statements related to imaging, and patient education/advice and self-management. In addition, the Canadian and Australian standards also provide consistent recommendations regarding comprehensive assessment, psychological support, and review and patient referral. However, the three clinical care standards differ in the statements related to psychological assessment, opioid analgesics, non-opioid analgesics, and non-pharmacological therapies. The three national clinical care standards provide consistent recommendations on imaging and patient education/advice, self-management of the condition, and two standards (Canadian and Australian) agree on recommendations regarding comprehensive assessment, psychological support, and review and patient referral. The standards differ in the quality statements related to psychological assessment, opioid prescription, non-opioid analgesics, and non-pharmacological therapies | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Clinical care standards | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Low back pain | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality of health care | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vera, Gustavo E Z |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Maher, Chris G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ferreira, Giovanni E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Machado, Gustavo C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Buchbinder, Rachelle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pinto, Rafael Z |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Oliveira, Crystian B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Rheumatology international |d 1985 |g (2024) vom: 29. Feb. |w (DE-627)NLM012644315 |x 1437-160X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:29 |g month:02 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05543-2 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 29 |c 02 | ||