Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT) : an observational, feasibility study to improve dental office safety
© 2024. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a substantial interruption of care, with patients and workers fearful to return to the dental office. As dental practice creates a highly aerosolized environment, the potential for spread of airborne illness is magnified. As a means to increase safety and mitigate risk, pre-visit testing for SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to minimize disease transmission in dental offices. The Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Testing (PREDICT) Feasibility Study examined the logistics and impact of two different testing mechanisms (laboratory-based PCR viral testing and point-of-care antigen testing) in dental offices.
METHODS: Dental healthcare workers (DHCWs) and patients in four dental offices within the National Dental Practice-based Research Network participated in this prospective study. In addition to electronic surveys, participants in two offices completed POC testing, while participants in two offices used lab-based PCR methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. Analysis was limited to descriptive measures, with median and interquartile ranges reported for Likert scale responses and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables.
RESULTS: Of the total 72 enrolled, 28 DHCWs and 41 patients completed the protocol. Two patients (4.9%) tested positive prior to their visit, while 2 DHCWs (12.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the start of the study. DHCWs and patients shared similar degree of concern (69% and 63%, respectively) for contracting COVID-19 from patients, while patients feared contracting COVID-19 from DHCWs less (49%). Descriptive statistics calculations revealed that saliva, tongue epithelial cells, and nasal swabs were the most desirable specimen collection method; both testing (LAB and POC) protocols took similar amounts of total time to complete; and DHCWs and patients reported feeling more comfortable when both groups were tested.
CONCLUSIONS: While a larger-scale, network study is necessary for generalizability of results, this feasibility study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 testing can be effectively implemented into dental practice workflows and positively impact perception of safety for DHCWs and patients. As new virulent infectious diseases emerge, preparing dental personnel to employ an entire toolbox of risk mitigation strategies, including testing, may have the potential to decrease dental practice closure time, maintaining continuity of dental care services for patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05123742.
| Errataetall: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:10 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Pilot and feasibility studies - 10(2024), 1 vom: 28. Feb., Seite 44 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Fredericks-Younger, Janine [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
COVID-19 testing |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 11.03.2024 published: Electronic ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05123742 UpdateOf: Res Sq. 2023 Sep 07;:. - PMID 37720040 Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s40814-024-01471-x |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM369090454 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM369090454 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240311232500.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240229s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s40814-024-01471-x |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1323.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM369090454 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38419131 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fredericks-Younger, Janine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT) |b an observational, feasibility study to improve dental office safety |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 11.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05123742 | ||
| 500 | |a UpdateOf: Res Sq. 2023 Sep 07;:. - PMID 37720040 | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a substantial interruption of care, with patients and workers fearful to return to the dental office. As dental practice creates a highly aerosolized environment, the potential for spread of airborne illness is magnified. As a means to increase safety and mitigate risk, pre-visit testing for SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to minimize disease transmission in dental offices. The Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Testing (PREDICT) Feasibility Study examined the logistics and impact of two different testing mechanisms (laboratory-based PCR viral testing and point-of-care antigen testing) in dental offices | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Dental healthcare workers (DHCWs) and patients in four dental offices within the National Dental Practice-based Research Network participated in this prospective study. In addition to electronic surveys, participants in two offices completed POC testing, while participants in two offices used lab-based PCR methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. Analysis was limited to descriptive measures, with median and interquartile ranges reported for Likert scale responses and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Of the total 72 enrolled, 28 DHCWs and 41 patients completed the protocol. Two patients (4.9%) tested positive prior to their visit, while 2 DHCWs (12.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the start of the study. DHCWs and patients shared similar degree of concern (69% and 63%, respectively) for contracting COVID-19 from patients, while patients feared contracting COVID-19 from DHCWs less (49%). Descriptive statistics calculations revealed that saliva, tongue epithelial cells, and nasal swabs were the most desirable specimen collection method; both testing (LAB and POC) protocols took similar amounts of total time to complete; and DHCWs and patients reported feeling more comfortable when both groups were tested | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: While a larger-scale, network study is necessary for generalizability of results, this feasibility study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 testing can be effectively implemented into dental practice workflows and positively impact perception of safety for DHCWs and patients. As new virulent infectious diseases emerge, preparing dental personnel to employ an entire toolbox of risk mitigation strategies, including testing, may have the potential to decrease dental practice closure time, maintaining continuity of dental care services for patients | ||
| 520 | |a TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05123742 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 testing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Continuity of patient care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental offices | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Feasibility studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health personnel | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infection control | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Perception | |
| 650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Workforce | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Feldman, Cecile A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Allareddy, Veerasathpurush |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Funkhouser, Ellen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McBurnie, MaryAnn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meyerowitz, Cyril |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ragusa, Pat |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chapman-Greene, Julie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Coker, Modupe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fine, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gennaro, Maria Laura |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Subramanian, Gayathri |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Pilot and feasibility studies |d 2015 |g 10(2024), 1 vom: 28. Feb., Seite 44 |w (DE-627)NLM258096756 |x 2055-5784 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:02 |g pages:44 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01471-x |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 10 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 28 |c 02 |h 44 | ||