Comparison of the efficiency of ultrafiltration, precipitation, and ultracentrifugation methods for exosome isolation
© 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V..
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are enclosed by a lipid-bilayer membrane and secreted by all types of cells. They are classified into three groups: apoptotic bodies, microvesicles, and exosomes. Exosomes play a number of important roles in the intercellular communication and crosstalk between tissues in the body. In this study, we use three common methods based on different principles for exosome isolation, namely ultrafiltration, precipitation, and ultracentrifugation. We use field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) analyses for characterization of exosomes. The functionality and effect of isolated exosomes on the viability of hypoxic cells was investigated by alamarBlue and Flow-cytometry. The results of the FESEM study show that the ultrafiltration method isolates vesicles with higher variability of shapes and sizes when compared to the precipitation and ultracentrifugation methods. DLS results show that mean size of exosomes isolated by ultrafiltration, precipitation, and ultracentrifugation methods are 122, 89, and 60 nm respectively. AlamarBlue analysis show that isolated exosomes increase the viability of damaged cells by 11%, 15%, and 22%, respectively. Flow-cytometry analysis of damaged cells also show that these vesicles increase the content of live cells by 9%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. This study shows that exosomes isolated by the ultracentrifugation method are characterized by smaller size and narrow size distribution. Furthermore, more homogenous particles isolated by this method show increased efficiency of the protection of hypoxic cells in comparison with the exosomes isolated by the two other methods.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:38 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Biochemistry and biophysics reports - 38(2024) vom: 15. Feb., Seite 101668 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Ansari, Farshid Jaberi [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Exosomes |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 27.02.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101668 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM36895630X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM36895630X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240229165007.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240229s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101668 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1309.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM36895630X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38405663 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ansari, Farshid Jaberi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of the efficiency of ultrafiltration, precipitation, and ultracentrifugation methods for exosome isolation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 27.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V. | ||
| 520 | |a Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are enclosed by a lipid-bilayer membrane and secreted by all types of cells. They are classified into three groups: apoptotic bodies, microvesicles, and exosomes. Exosomes play a number of important roles in the intercellular communication and crosstalk between tissues in the body. In this study, we use three common methods based on different principles for exosome isolation, namely ultrafiltration, precipitation, and ultracentrifugation. We use field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) analyses for characterization of exosomes. The functionality and effect of isolated exosomes on the viability of hypoxic cells was investigated by alamarBlue and Flow-cytometry. The results of the FESEM study show that the ultrafiltration method isolates vesicles with higher variability of shapes and sizes when compared to the precipitation and ultracentrifugation methods. DLS results show that mean size of exosomes isolated by ultrafiltration, precipitation, and ultracentrifugation methods are 122, 89, and 60 nm respectively. AlamarBlue analysis show that isolated exosomes increase the viability of damaged cells by 11%, 15%, and 22%, respectively. Flow-cytometry analysis of damaged cells also show that these vesicles increase the content of live cells by 9%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. This study shows that exosomes isolated by the ultracentrifugation method are characterized by smaller size and narrow size distribution. Furthermore, more homogenous particles isolated by this method show increased efficiency of the protection of hypoxic cells in comparison with the exosomes isolated by the two other methods | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Exosomes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Isolation methods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Precipitation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ultracentrifugation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ultrafiltration | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tafti, Hossein Ahmadi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Amanzadeh, Amir |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rabbani, Shahram |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shokrgozar, Mohammad Ali |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Heidari, Reza |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Behroozi, Javad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Eyni, Hossein |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Uversky, Vladimir N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ghanbari, Hossein |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Biochemistry and biophysics reports |d 2015 |g 38(2024) vom: 15. Feb., Seite 101668 |w (DE-627)NLM251624714 |x 2405-5808 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2024 |g day:15 |g month:02 |g pages:101668 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101668 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 38 |j 2024 |b 15 |c 02 |h 101668 | ||