Gut microbiota in patients with prostate cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis
© 2024. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence indicates that gut microbiota are closely related to prostate cancer. This study aims to assess the gut microbiota composition in patients with prostate cancer compared to healthy participants, thereby advancing understanding of gut microbiota's role in prostate cancer.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and pertinent data were analyzed. The kappa score assessed interrater agreement.
RESULTS: This study encompassed seven research papers, involving 250 prostate cancer patients and 192 controls. The kappa was 0.93. Meta-analysis results showed that alpha-diversity of gut microbiota in prostate cancer patients was significantly lower than in the control group. In terms of gut microbiota abundance, the ratio of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidia, Clostridia, Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, Escherichia-Shigella, Faecalibacterium, and Bacteroides was higher in prostate cancer patients. Conversely, the abundance ratio of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Selenomonadales, Veillonella, and Megasphaera was higher in the control group.
CONCLUSION: Our study reveals differences in alpha-diversity and abundance of gut microbiota between patients with prostate cancer and controls, indicating gut microbiota dysbiosis in those with prostate cancer. However, given the limited quality and quantity of selected studies, further research is necessary to validate these findings.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
BMC cancer - 24(2024), 1 vom: 24. Feb., Seite 261 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Huang, Haotian [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
16S sequencing |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.02.2024 Date Revised 27.02.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1186/s12885-024-12018-x |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM368923614 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM368923614 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240229164838.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240229s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12885-024-12018-x |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1309.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM368923614 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38402385 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Huang, Haotian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Gut microbiota in patients with prostate cancer |b a systematic review and meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 27.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence indicates that gut microbiota are closely related to prostate cancer. This study aims to assess the gut microbiota composition in patients with prostate cancer compared to healthy participants, thereby advancing understanding of gut microbiota's role in prostate cancer | ||
520 | |a METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and pertinent data were analyzed. The kappa score assessed interrater agreement | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: This study encompassed seven research papers, involving 250 prostate cancer patients and 192 controls. The kappa was 0.93. Meta-analysis results showed that alpha-diversity of gut microbiota in prostate cancer patients was significantly lower than in the control group. In terms of gut microbiota abundance, the ratio of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidia, Clostridia, Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, Escherichia-Shigella, Faecalibacterium, and Bacteroides was higher in prostate cancer patients. Conversely, the abundance ratio of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Selenomonadales, Veillonella, and Megasphaera was higher in the control group | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Our study reveals differences in alpha-diversity and abundance of gut microbiota between patients with prostate cancer and controls, indicating gut microbiota dysbiosis in those with prostate cancer. However, given the limited quality and quantity of selected studies, further research is necessary to validate these findings | ||
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a 16S sequencing | |
650 | 4 | |a Gut microbiota | |
650 | 4 | |a Microbiome | |
650 | 4 | |a Prostate cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic review and meta-analysis | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wen, Zhi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Caixia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Chongjian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Hongyuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yang, Xuesong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC cancer |d 2001 |g 24(2024), 1 vom: 24. Feb., Seite 261 |w (DE-627)NLM111431948 |x 1471-2407 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:24 |g month:02 |g pages:261 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12018-x |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 24 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 24 |c 02 |h 261 |