An international multicenter study comparing COVID-19 omicron outcomes in patients with hematological malignancies treated with obinutuzumab versus rituximab
© 2024 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
OBJECTIVES: Hematological malignancy (HM) patients treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are at higher risk for severe COVID-19. A previous single-center study showed worse outcomes in patients treated with obinutuzumab compared to rituximab. We examined this hypothesis in a large international multicenter cohort.
METHODS: We included HM patients from 15 centers, from five countries treated with anti-CD20, comparing those treated with obinutuzumab (O-G) to rituximab (R-G) between December 2021 and June 2022, when Omicron lineage was dominant.
RESULTS: We collected data on 1048 patients. Within the R-G (n = 762, 73%), 191 (25%) contracted COVID-19 compared to 103 (36%) in the O-G. COVID-19 patients in the O-G were younger (61 ± 11.7 vs. 64 ± 14.5, p = 0.039), had more indolent HM diagnosis (aggressive lymphoma: 3.9% vs. 67.0%, p < 0.001), and most were on maintenance therapy at COVID-19 diagnosis (63.0% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001). Severe-critical COVID-19 occurred in 31.1% of patients in the O-G and 22.5% in the R-G. In multivariable analysis, O-G had a 2.08-fold increased risk for severe-critical COVID-19 compared to R-G (95% CI 1.13-3.84), adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index, sex, and tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T-C) prophylaxis. Further analysis comparing O-G to R-G demonstrated increased hospitalizations (51.5% vs. 35.6% p = 0.008), ICU admissions (12.6% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.042), but the nonsignificant difference in COVID-19-related mortality (n = 10, 9.7% vs. n = 12, 6.3%, p = 0.293).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite younger age and a more indolent HM diagnosis, patients receiving obinutuzumab had more severe COVID-19 outcomes than those receiving rituximab. Our findings underscore the need to evaluate the risk-benefit balance when considering obinutuzumab therapy for HM patients during respiratory viral outbreaks.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Cancer medicine - 13(2024), 3 vom: 01. Feb., Seite e6997 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Shafat, Tali [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
4F4X42SYQ6 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.02.2024 Date Revised 27.02.2024 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1002/cam4.6997 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM368906620 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM368906620 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240229164827.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240229s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/cam4.6997 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1309.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM368906620 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38400683 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Shafat, Tali |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 3 | |a An international multicenter study comparing COVID-19 omicron outcomes in patients with hematological malignancies treated with obinutuzumab versus rituximab |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 27.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2024 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Hematological malignancy (HM) patients treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are at higher risk for severe COVID-19. A previous single-center study showed worse outcomes in patients treated with obinutuzumab compared to rituximab. We examined this hypothesis in a large international multicenter cohort | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We included HM patients from 15 centers, from five countries treated with anti-CD20, comparing those treated with obinutuzumab (O-G) to rituximab (R-G) between December 2021 and June 2022, when Omicron lineage was dominant | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: We collected data on 1048 patients. Within the R-G (n = 762, 73%), 191 (25%) contracted COVID-19 compared to 103 (36%) in the O-G. COVID-19 patients in the O-G were younger (61 ± 11.7 vs. 64 ± 14.5, p = 0.039), had more indolent HM diagnosis (aggressive lymphoma: 3.9% vs. 67.0%, p < 0.001), and most were on maintenance therapy at COVID-19 diagnosis (63.0% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001). Severe-critical COVID-19 occurred in 31.1% of patients in the O-G and 22.5% in the R-G. In multivariable analysis, O-G had a 2.08-fold increased risk for severe-critical COVID-19 compared to R-G (95% CI 1.13-3.84), adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index, sex, and tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T-C) prophylaxis. Further analysis comparing O-G to R-G demonstrated increased hospitalizations (51.5% vs. 35.6% p = 0.008), ICU admissions (12.6% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.042), but the nonsignificant difference in COVID-19-related mortality (n = 10, 9.7% vs. n = 12, 6.3%, p = 0.293) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Despite younger age and a more indolent HM diagnosis, patients receiving obinutuzumab had more severe COVID-19 outcomes than those receiving rituximab. Our findings underscore the need to evaluate the risk-benefit balance when considering obinutuzumab therapy for HM patients during respiratory viral outbreaks | ||
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies | |
650 | 4 | |a hematological malignancies | |
650 | 4 | |a obinutuzumab | |
650 | 4 | |a rituximab | |
650 | 7 | |a Rituximab |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 4F4X42SYQ6 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a obinutuzumab |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a O43472U9X8 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Grupel, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Porges, Tzvika |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Abuhasira, Ran |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Belkin, Ana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Deri, Ofir |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Oster, Yonatan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zahran, Shadi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Horwitz, Ehud |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Horowitz, Netanel A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Khatib, Hazim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Batista, Marjorie Vieira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cortez, Anita Cassoli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Brosh-Nissimov, Tal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Segman, Yafit |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ishay, Linor |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cohen, Regev |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Atamna, Alaa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Spallone, Amy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chemaly, Roy F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ramos-Ramos, Juan Carlos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chowers, Michal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rogozin, Evgeny |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Oren, Noga Carmi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Keske, Şiran |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Barchad, Orit Wolfovitz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nesher, Lior |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Respiratory Viruses (ESGREV) |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cancer medicine |d 2012 |g 13(2024), 3 vom: 01. Feb., Seite e6997 |w (DE-627)NLM224388460 |x 2045-7634 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:02 |g pages:e6997 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6997 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 01 |c 02 |h e6997 |