Prognostic value of preoperative radiographic perinephric fat features in renal cell carcinoma patients undergoing surgery
Copyright © 2024 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the prognostic importance of perinephric fat features in images of patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing surgery.
METHODS: We enrolled RCC patients who underwent surgical treatment between 2011 and 2019. Two characteristics, including perinephric fat thickness and perinephric fat stranding, were evaluated using preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance images. The association between perinephric fat characteristics and disease progression was examined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model.
RESULTS: In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for tumor stage, intratumoral necrosis, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, we found that patients in the thin perinephric fat group (<1 cm) had a poorer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the thick perinephric fat group (≥1 cm) (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.175-6.674, p = 0.02). Additionally, the fat stranding group had a poorer PFS than the non-stranding group (HR 3.852; 95% CI 1.082-13.704, p = 0.037). The non-stranding with thick perinephric fat group exhibits the highest cumulative PFS while the stranding with thin perinephric fat group has the lowest cumulative PFS. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, combing these two perinephric fat characteristics with tumor stage can achieve a better discriminatory power than tumor stage alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the evaluation of image-based perinephric fat features is a simple, straightforward, reproducible tool for predicting RCC prognosis and may assist in preoperative risk stratification.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Asian journal of surgery - (2024) vom: 20. Feb. |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Kuo, Yuh-Ren [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Journal Article |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 21.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.02.048 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM368732045 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM368732045 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240222233053.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240222s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.02.048 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1302.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM368732045 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38383186 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1015-9584(24)00306-3 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kuo, Yuh-Ren |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prognostic value of preoperative radiographic perinephric fat features in renal cell carcinoma patients undergoing surgery |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2024 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the prognostic importance of perinephric fat features in images of patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing surgery | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We enrolled RCC patients who underwent surgical treatment between 2011 and 2019. Two characteristics, including perinephric fat thickness and perinephric fat stranding, were evaluated using preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance images. The association between perinephric fat characteristics and disease progression was examined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for tumor stage, intratumoral necrosis, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, we found that patients in the thin perinephric fat group (<1 cm) had a poorer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the thick perinephric fat group (≥1 cm) (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.175-6.674, p = 0.02). Additionally, the fat stranding group had a poorer PFS than the non-stranding group (HR 3.852; 95% CI 1.082-13.704, p = 0.037). The non-stranding with thick perinephric fat group exhibits the highest cumulative PFS while the stranding with thin perinephric fat group has the lowest cumulative PFS. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, combing these two perinephric fat characteristics with tumor stage can achieve a better discriminatory power than tumor stage alone | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the evaluation of image-based perinephric fat features is a simple, straightforward, reproducible tool for predicting RCC prognosis and may assist in preoperative risk stratification | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Perinephric fat stranding | |
650 | 4 | |a Perinephric fat thickness | |
650 | 4 | |a Progression-free survival | |
650 | 4 | |a Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Renal cell carcinoma | |
700 | 1 | |a Lee, Ya-Che |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Chung-Teng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Wan-Chen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ou, Chien-Hui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lin, Kun-Che |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cheng, Tsung-Han |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jan, Hau-Chern |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hu, Che-Yuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Asian journal of surgery |d 1996 |g (2024) vom: 20. Feb. |w (DE-627)NLM088679047 |x 0219-3108 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:20 |g month:02 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.02.048 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2024 |b 20 |c 02 |