Telemedicine visits requiring follow-up in-person visits at an urban academic family medicine centre
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissionsoup.com..
BACKGROUND: With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was rapidly implemented in care settings globally. To understand what factors affect the successful completion of telemedicine visits in our urban, academic family medicine clinic setting, we analysed telemedicine visits carried out during the pandemic.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of telemedicine visits from 2 clinical units within a family medicine centre. To investigate the association between incomplete visits and various factors (age, gender, presenting complaints, physician level of training [resident or staff] and patient-physician relational continuity), we performed a multivariable logistic regression on data from August 2020, February 2021, and May 2021. An incomplete visit is one that requires a follow-up in-person visit with a physician within 3 days.
RESULTS: Of the 2,138 telemedicine patient visits we investigated, 9.6% were incomplete. Patients presenting with lumps and bumps (OR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.44, 10.5), as well as those seen by resident physicians (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.56) had increased odds of incomplete visits. Telemedicine visits at the family medicine clinic (Site A) with registered patients had lower odds of incomplete visits (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.39) than those at the community clinic (Site B), which provides urgent/episodic care with no associated relational continuity between patients and physicians.
CONCLUSION: In our urban clinical setting, only a small minority of telemedicine visits required an in-person follow-up visit. This information may be useful in guiding approaches to triaging patients to telemedicine or standard in-person care.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:41 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Family practice - 41(2024), 2 vom: 15. Apr., Seite 105-113 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Arsenault, Mylène [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Continuity of patient care |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.04.2024 Date Revised 16.04.2024 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1093/fampra/cmae008 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM368720608 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM368720608 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240416232556.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240222s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/fampra/cmae008 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1377.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM368720608 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38382045 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Arsenault, Mylène |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Telemedicine visits requiring follow-up in-person visits at an urban academic family medicine centre |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 16.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 16.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissionsoup.com. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was rapidly implemented in care settings globally. To understand what factors affect the successful completion of telemedicine visits in our urban, academic family medicine clinic setting, we analysed telemedicine visits carried out during the pandemic | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of telemedicine visits from 2 clinical units within a family medicine centre. To investigate the association between incomplete visits and various factors (age, gender, presenting complaints, physician level of training [resident or staff] and patient-physician relational continuity), we performed a multivariable logistic regression on data from August 2020, February 2021, and May 2021. An incomplete visit is one that requires a follow-up in-person visit with a physician within 3 days | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Of the 2,138 telemedicine patient visits we investigated, 9.6% were incomplete. Patients presenting with lumps and bumps (OR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.44, 10.5), as well as those seen by resident physicians (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.56) had increased odds of incomplete visits. Telemedicine visits at the family medicine clinic (Site A) with registered patients had lower odds of incomplete visits (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.39) than those at the community clinic (Site B), which provides urgent/episodic care with no associated relational continuity between patients and physicians | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: In our urban clinical setting, only a small minority of telemedicine visits required an in-person follow-up visit. This information may be useful in guiding approaches to triaging patients to telemedicine or standard in-person care | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a continuity of patient care | |
650 | 4 | |a graduate medical education | |
650 | 4 | |a primary health care | |
650 | 4 | |a telehealth | |
650 | 4 | |a telemedicine | |
650 | 4 | |a virtual medicine | |
700 | 1 | |a Long, Stephanie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a D'Souza, Vinita |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ilie, Alexandru |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Todd, Keith J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Family practice |d 1993 |g 41(2024), 2 vom: 15. Apr., Seite 105-113 |w (DE-627)NLM013359614 |x 1460-2229 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:15 |g month:04 |g pages:105-113 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae008 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 41 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 15 |c 04 |h 105-113 |