Review and analysis of history and utilization of pneumatic retinopexy after pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment outcomes randomized trial (PIVOT)
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved..
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe the history and series results of pneumatic retinopexy (PnR)and provide an analysis of PnR utilization after publication of results of pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment outcomes randomized trial (PIVOT).
RECENT FINDINGS: No significant trends were found for average number of services ( P = 0.153) of PnR after the publication of PIVOT results.
SUMMARY: PnR is a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair technique that was first described in the early 1900 s and has evolved over time to become a modern-day, minimally invasive, underutilized treatment option. Other repair techniques for RRD include scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), which has been compared to the use of PnR in PIVOT. Results of PIVOT concluded that PnR offered superior visual acuity and noninferiority. PnR is underutilized in the United States even after publication of results of PIVOT deemed it a noninferior treatment. Lack of a significant increase in national utilization of PnR could be associated with multifactorial clinician, systems, and financial reasons in the real-world setting.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:35 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Current opinion in ophthalmology - 35(2024), 3 vom: 01. März, Seite 217-222 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Shah, Serena [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.03.2024 Date Revised 25.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1097/ICU.0000000000001039 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM368548457 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM368548457 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240325234854.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240217s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001039 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1346.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM368548457 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38364771 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Shah, Serena |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Review and analysis of history and utilization of pneumatic retinopexy after pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment outcomes randomized trial (PIVOT) |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 25.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe the history and series results of pneumatic retinopexy (PnR)and provide an analysis of PnR utilization after publication of results of pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment outcomes randomized trial (PIVOT) | ||
| 520 | |a RECENT FINDINGS: No significant trends were found for average number of services ( P = 0.153) of PnR after the publication of PIVOT results | ||
| 520 | |a SUMMARY: PnR is a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair technique that was first described in the early 1900 s and has evolved over time to become a modern-day, minimally invasive, underutilized treatment option. Other repair techniques for RRD include scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), which has been compared to the use of PnR in PIVOT. Results of PIVOT concluded that PnR offered superior visual acuity and noninferiority. PnR is underutilized in the United States even after publication of results of PIVOT deemed it a noninferior treatment. Lack of a significant increase in national utilization of PnR could be associated with multifactorial clinician, systems, and financial reasons in the real-world setting | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chou, Brandon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Patel, Marissa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Watane, Arjun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shah, Lea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yannuzzi, Nicolas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sridhar, Jayanth |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Current opinion in ophthalmology |d 1990 |g 35(2024), 3 vom: 01. März, Seite 217-222 |w (DE-627)NLM089765060 |x 1531-7021 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:03 |g pages:217-222 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001039 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 35 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 01 |c 03 |h 217-222 | ||