Epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean sections : a system review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: It is still no consensus on the use of ropivacaine or bupivacaine in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section (CS), because their anesthetic potency and relative complications remains controversial. This system review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective CSs and investigate relative complications for parturients and neonates.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, and Google Scholar to June 30, 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared epidural ropivacaine with bupivacaine for elective CSs. The success rate of epidural anesthesia (EA) was primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included onset times of sensory block, maternal side effects, neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical artery pH.
RESULTS: We analyzed 8 RCTs with 532 parturients. 0.75% ropivacaine is associated with a shorter onset time of sensory block than 0.5% bupivacaine (SMD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.70 to -0.17; p = .001). 0.5% ropivacaine resulted in a reduced nausea than 0.5% bupivacaine (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.83; p = .008). In addition, there were no significant difference between ropivacaine and bupivacaine groups in terms of success rate of epidural anesthesia, maternal side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, shivering), and neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical artery pH.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that there were no significant difference between epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective CSs in terms of the success rate (85.9% vs. 83.5), maternal side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, shivering), and neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical artery pH. But compared with 0.5% bupivacaine, epidural 0.75% ropivacaine was mildly effective for reducing onset time of sensory block and 0.5% ropivacaine reduced the incidence of maternal nausea.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:37 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians - 37(2024), 1 vom: 09. Feb., Seite 2313356 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Kang, Tao [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
7IO5LYA57N |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.02.2024 Date Revised 14.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1080/14767058.2024.2313356 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM36832141X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM36832141X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240214233342.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240212s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14767058.2024.2313356 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1293.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM36832141X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38342577 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kang, Tao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean sections |b a system review and meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 14.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 14.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: It is still no consensus on the use of ropivacaine or bupivacaine in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section (CS), because their anesthetic potency and relative complications remains controversial. This system review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective CSs and investigate relative complications for parturients and neonates | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, and Google Scholar to June 30, 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared epidural ropivacaine with bupivacaine for elective CSs. The success rate of epidural anesthesia (EA) was primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included onset times of sensory block, maternal side effects, neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical artery pH | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: We analyzed 8 RCTs with 532 parturients. 0.75% ropivacaine is associated with a shorter onset time of sensory block than 0.5% bupivacaine (SMD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.70 to -0.17; p = .001). 0.5% ropivacaine resulted in a reduced nausea than 0.5% bupivacaine (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.83; p = .008). In addition, there were no significant difference between ropivacaine and bupivacaine groups in terms of success rate of epidural anesthesia, maternal side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, shivering), and neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical artery pH | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that there were no significant difference between epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective CSs in terms of the success rate (85.9% vs. 83.5), maternal side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, shivering), and neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical artery pH. But compared with 0.5% bupivacaine, epidural 0.75% ropivacaine was mildly effective for reducing onset time of sensory block and 0.5% ropivacaine reduced the incidence of maternal nausea | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epidural | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bupivacaine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cesarean section | |
| 650 | 4 | |a meta-analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ropivacaine | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Bupivacaine |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Y8335394RO |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ropivacaine |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 7IO5LYA57N |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics, Local |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Amides |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tao, Jiwei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Xuetao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jin, Dan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians |d 2002 |g 37(2024), 1 vom: 09. Feb., Seite 2313356 |w (DE-627)NLM121648222 |x 1476-4954 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:09 |g month:02 |g pages:2313356 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2313356 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 37 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 09 |c 02 |h 2313356 | ||