Content Comparison of Quality-of-Life Instruments Used in Economic Evaluations of Sleep Disorder Interventions : A Systematic Review
© 2024. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life (QoL) in people living with sleep disorders using questionnaires is necessary to compare intervention benefits. Knowledge of the content and concepts covered by specific QoL instruments is essential to determine which instruments are best suited for conducting economic evaluations of sleep-related interventions.
OBJECTIVES: This review aims to identify the QoL instruments that have been applied in economic evaluations of sleep disorder interventions and compare their conceptual overlap and content coverage using the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
METHODS: A systematic review of full economic evaluations in sleep published in peer-reviewed journals from conception to 30 May, 2023 was conducted. MEDLINE, PsychInfo, ProQuest, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and Emcare were searched for eligible studies. Studies incorporating either generic or sleep-specific QoL instruments as the primary or secondary measures of effectiveness within a full economic evaluation were included. Quality appraisal against the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Economic Evaluations and EURONHEED checklists and mapping of QoL items to ICF categories were performed by two reviewers, with a third helping settle any potential differences.
RESULTS: Sixteen instruments were identified as having been used in sleep health economic evaluations. The EQ-5D-3L, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Insomnia Severity Index were the most widely used, but the latter two are predominantly diagnostic tools and not specifically designed to guide economic evaluations. Other instruments with broader ICF content coverage have been least used, and these include the Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, 15 Dimensions, Short-Form 6 Dimensions, 12-item Short Form Survey, 36-item Short Form Survey and the GRID Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of current QoL instruments used in economic evaluations of sleep with respect to their content coverage. A combination of generic and sleep-specific instruments with broader ICF content coverage is recommended for such evaluations.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:42 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
PharmacoEconomics - 42(2024), 5 vom: 10. Apr., Seite 507-526 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Kaambwa, Billingsley [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Comparative Study |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 23.04.2024 Date Revised 26.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s40273-023-01349-5 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM368297330 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM368297330 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240426233657.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240211s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s40273-023-01349-5 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1388.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM368297330 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38340220 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kaambwa, Billingsley |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Content Comparison of Quality-of-Life Instruments Used in Economic Evaluations of Sleep Disorder Interventions |b A Systematic Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 23.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 26.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life (QoL) in people living with sleep disorders using questionnaires is necessary to compare intervention benefits. Knowledge of the content and concepts covered by specific QoL instruments is essential to determine which instruments are best suited for conducting economic evaluations of sleep-related interventions | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVES: This review aims to identify the QoL instruments that have been applied in economic evaluations of sleep disorder interventions and compare their conceptual overlap and content coverage using the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: A systematic review of full economic evaluations in sleep published in peer-reviewed journals from conception to 30 May, 2023 was conducted. MEDLINE, PsychInfo, ProQuest, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and Emcare were searched for eligible studies. Studies incorporating either generic or sleep-specific QoL instruments as the primary or secondary measures of effectiveness within a full economic evaluation were included. Quality appraisal against the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Economic Evaluations and EURONHEED checklists and mapping of QoL items to ICF categories were performed by two reviewers, with a third helping settle any potential differences | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Sixteen instruments were identified as having been used in sleep health economic evaluations. The EQ-5D-3L, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Insomnia Severity Index were the most widely used, but the latter two are predominantly diagnostic tools and not specifically designed to guide economic evaluations. Other instruments with broader ICF content coverage have been least used, and these include the Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, 15 Dimensions, Short-Form 6 Dimensions, 12-item Short Form Survey, 36-item Short Form Survey and the GRID Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of current QoL instruments used in economic evaluations of sleep with respect to their content coverage. A combination of generic and sleep-specific instruments with broader ICF content coverage is recommended for such evaluations | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Woods, Taylor-Jade |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Natsky, Andrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bulamu, Norma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Loffler, Kelly A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sweetman, Alexander |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Catcheside, Peter G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Reynolds, Amy C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Adams, Robert |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Eckert, Danny J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t PharmacoEconomics |d 1992 |g 42(2024), 5 vom: 10. Apr., Seite 507-526 |w (DE-627)NLM09167039X |x 1179-2027 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2024 |g number:5 |g day:10 |g month:04 |g pages:507-526 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-023-01349-5 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 42 |j 2024 |e 5 |b 10 |c 04 |h 507-526 | ||