Comparison of azvudine, molnupiravir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 : a retrospective cohort study
© 2024. The Author(s)..
This study aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of azvudine, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and molnupiravir in adult patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. This retrospective cohort study included patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (asymptomatic, mild, and common types) at the First Hospital of Changsha (Hunan Province, China) between March and November 2022. Eligible patients were classified into the azvudine, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, or molnupiravir groups according to the antiviral agents they received. The outcomes were the times to nucleic acid negative conversion (NANC). This study included 157 patients treated with azvudine (n = 66), molnupiravir (n = 66), or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 25). There were no statistically significant differences in the time from diagnosis to NANC among the azvudine, molnupiravir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir groups [median, 9 (95% CI 9-11) vs. 11 (95% CI 10-12) vs. 9 (95% CI 8-12) days, P = 0.15], time from administration to NANC [median, 9 (95% CI 8-10) vs. 10 (95% CI 9.48-11) vs. 8.708 (95% CI 7.51-11) days, P = 0.50], or hospital stay [median, 11 (95% CI 11-13) vs. 13 (95% CI 12-14) vs. 12 (95% CI 10-14) days, P = 0.14], even after adjustment for sex, age, COVID-19 type, comorbidities, Ct level, time from diagnosis to antiviral treatment, and number of symptoms. The cumulative NANC rates in the azvudine, molnupiravir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir groups were 15.2%/12.3%/16.0% at day 5 (P = 0.858), 34.8%/21.5%/32.0% at day 7 (P = 0.226), 66.7%/52.3%/60.0% at 10 days (P = 0.246), and 86.4%/86.2%/80.0% at day 14 (P = 0.721). No serious adverse events were reported. Azvudine may be comparable to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in adult patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 regarding time to NANC, hospital stay, and AEs.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:14 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Scientific reports - 14(2024), 1 vom: 09. Feb., Seite 3318 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Chen, Mei-Ping [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.02.2024 Date Revised 14.02.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1038/s41598-024-53862-y |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM368265013 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM368265013 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240214233315.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240210s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1038/s41598-024-53862-y |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1293.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM368265013 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38337014 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chen, Mei-Ping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of azvudine, molnupiravir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 |b a retrospective cohort study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 14.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 14.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a This study aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of azvudine, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and molnupiravir in adult patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. This retrospective cohort study included patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (asymptomatic, mild, and common types) at the First Hospital of Changsha (Hunan Province, China) between March and November 2022. Eligible patients were classified into the azvudine, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, or molnupiravir groups according to the antiviral agents they received. The outcomes were the times to nucleic acid negative conversion (NANC). This study included 157 patients treated with azvudine (n = 66), molnupiravir (n = 66), or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 25). There were no statistically significant differences in the time from diagnosis to NANC among the azvudine, molnupiravir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir groups [median, 9 (95% CI 9-11) vs. 11 (95% CI 10-12) vs. 9 (95% CI 8-12) days, P = 0.15], time from administration to NANC [median, 9 (95% CI 8-10) vs. 10 (95% CI 9.48-11) vs. 8.708 (95% CI 7.51-11) days, P = 0.50], or hospital stay [median, 11 (95% CI 11-13) vs. 13 (95% CI 12-14) vs. 12 (95% CI 10-14) days, P = 0.14], even after adjustment for sex, age, COVID-19 type, comorbidities, Ct level, time from diagnosis to antiviral treatment, and number of symptoms. The cumulative NANC rates in the azvudine, molnupiravir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir groups were 15.2%/12.3%/16.0% at day 5 (P = 0.858), 34.8%/21.5%/32.0% at day 7 (P = 0.226), 66.7%/52.3%/60.0% at 10 days (P = 0.246), and 86.4%/86.2%/80.0% at day 14 (P = 0.721). No serious adverse events were reported. Azvudine may be comparable to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in adult patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 regarding time to NANC, hospital stay, and AEs | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Azvudine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Molnupiravir | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Retrospective study | |
| 650 | 7 | |a azvudine |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a IJ2XP0ID0K |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a molnupiravir |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a YA84KI1VEW |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a nirmatrelvir |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 7R9A5P7H32 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ritonavir |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a O3J8G9O825 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Antiviral Agents |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hydroxylamines |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Deoxycytidine |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 0W860991D6 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Cytidine |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 5CSZ8459RP |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nitriles |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Lactams |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Proline |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 9DLQ4CIU6V |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Azides |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Leucine |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a GMW67QNF9C |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jiang, Di-Xuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rang, Jia-Xi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhuo, Hai-Bo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Zhi-Guo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scientific reports |d 2011 |g 14(2024), 1 vom: 09. Feb., Seite 3318 |w (DE-627)NLM215703936 |x 2045-2322 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:09 |g month:02 |g pages:3318 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53862-y |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 14 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 09 |c 02 |h 3318 | ||