Medical malpractice and cerebrospinal fluid shunts : An analysis of 36 cases

Many physicians, particularly neurosurgeons, face malpractice claims during their career. The aim of this paper is to identify which factors increase the risk of litigation and influence legal outcomes relating to cerebrospinal fluid shunt management. Westlaw, an online legal database, was used to identify all medico-legal cases pertaining to cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Information regarding plaintiff demographics, defendant specialties, reasons for litigation, and trial outcomes were analysed. Thirty-six cases met criteria for inclusion. Most cases returned a defence verdict (44.4%), with delayed treatment or failure to appropriately treat patients with shunts the most common reason for litigation (66.7%). The average plaintiff verdict payout was $4,888,136.75 and average settlement $1,362,307.69. Delay or failure to treat resulted in the largest average payouts for plaintiff verdicts and settlements ($5,329,299.14 and $1,531,500.00, respectively).

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2024

Erschienen:

2024

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024

Enthalten in:

The Medico-legal journal - (2024) vom: 09. Feb., Seite 258172231214902

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Pecorari, Isabella L [VerfasserIn]
Agarwal, Vijay [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Cerebrospinal fluid shunt
Journal Article
Medical malpractice
Neurosurgery
VP shunt
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 09.02.2024

published: Print-Electronic

Citation Status Publisher

doi:

10.1177/00258172231214902

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM368241955