Decurarization After Thoracic Anesthesia using sugammadex compared to neostigmine (DATA trial) : a multicenter randomized double-blinded controlled trial
© 2024. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: Thoracic surgery is a high-risk surgery especially for the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Postoperative residual paralysis has been shown to be a risk factor for pulmonary complications. Nevertheless, there are few data in the literature concerning the use of neuromuscular blocking agent antagonists in patients undergoing lung surgery.
METHODS: Seventy patients were randomized in three Italian centers to receive sugammadex or neostigmine at the end of thoracic surgery according to the depth of the residual neuromuscular block. The primary outcome was the time from reversal administration to a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) of 0.9. Secondary outcomes were the time to TOFR of 1.0, to extubation, to postanesthesia unit (PACU) discharge, postoperative complications until 30 days after surgery, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Median time to recovery to a TOFR of 0.9 was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group compared to the neostigmine one (88 vs. 278 s - P < 0.001). The percentage of patients who recovered to a TOFR of 0.9 within 5 min from reversal administration was 94.4% and 58.8% in the sugammadex and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The time to extubation, but not the PACU stay time, was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group. No differences were found between the study groups as regards postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. The superiority of sugammadex in shortening the recovery time was confirmed for both deep/moderate and shallow/minimal neuromuscular block.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing thoracic surgery, sugammadex ensures a faster recovery from the neuromuscular block and earlier extubation compared to neostigmine.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:4 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care - 4(2024), 1 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 9 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Piccioni, Federico [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Anesthesia |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 11.02.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s44158-024-00146-6 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM368214591 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM368214591 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240211232027.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240209s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s44158-024-00146-6 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1288.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM368214591 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38331969 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Piccioni, Federico |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Decurarization After Thoracic Anesthesia using sugammadex compared to neostigmine (DATA trial) |b a multicenter randomized double-blinded controlled trial |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 11.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Thoracic surgery is a high-risk surgery especially for the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Postoperative residual paralysis has been shown to be a risk factor for pulmonary complications. Nevertheless, there are few data in the literature concerning the use of neuromuscular blocking agent antagonists in patients undergoing lung surgery | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Seventy patients were randomized in three Italian centers to receive sugammadex or neostigmine at the end of thoracic surgery according to the depth of the residual neuromuscular block. The primary outcome was the time from reversal administration to a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) of 0.9. Secondary outcomes were the time to TOFR of 1.0, to extubation, to postanesthesia unit (PACU) discharge, postoperative complications until 30 days after surgery, and length of hospital stay | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Median time to recovery to a TOFR of 0.9 was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group compared to the neostigmine one (88 vs. 278 s - P < 0.001). The percentage of patients who recovered to a TOFR of 0.9 within 5 min from reversal administration was 94.4% and 58.8% in the sugammadex and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The time to extubation, but not the PACU stay time, was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group. No differences were found between the study groups as regards postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. The superiority of sugammadex in shortening the recovery time was confirmed for both deep/moderate and shallow/minimal neuromuscular block | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing thoracic surgery, sugammadex ensures a faster recovery from the neuromuscular block and earlier extubation compared to neostigmine | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Anesthesia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neostigmine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neuromuscular blockade | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Postoperative complications | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sugammadex | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thoracic surgery | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rosboch, Giulio L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Coccia, Cecilia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Donati, Ilaria |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Proto, Paolo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ceraolo, Edoardo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pierconti, Federico |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pagano, Martina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vernocchi, Daniele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Valenza, Franco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rocca, Giorgio Della |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care |d 2021 |g 4(2024), 1 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 9 |w (DE-627)NLM357760298 |x 2731-3786 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:08 |g month:02 |g pages:9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00146-6 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 4 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 08 |c 02 |h 9 | ||