no title
Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/..
Ten questions to assess to what degree a clinical practice guideline is likely to be trustworthy: 1) Do the authors have conflicts of interests? 2) Is the clinical question relevant? 3) Have relevant stakeholders been involved? 4) Have methods for study selection been described? 5) Is there a link between evidence and recommendations (transparent methods)? 6) Has the certainty of evidence been assessed? 7) Have the methods for reaching recommendations been described? 8) Are the recommendations unambiguous? 9) Are the recommendations relevant in your situation? 10) Is there an implementation strategy?.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:186 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Ugeskrift for laeger - 186(2024), 6 vom: 05. Feb. |
| Sprache: |
Dänisch |
|---|
| Weiterer Titel: |
Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.02.2024 Date Revised 01.04.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.61409/V09230579 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM368164330 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM368164330 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240401232602.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240208s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||dan c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.61409/V09230579 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1359.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM368164330 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38327203 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)V09230579 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a dan | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 14.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 01.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. | ||
| 520 | |a Ten questions to assess to what degree a clinical practice guideline is likely to be trustworthy: 1) Do the authors have conflicts of interests? 2) Is the clinical question relevant? 3) Have relevant stakeholders been involved? 4) Have methods for study selection been described? 5) Is there a link between evidence and recommendations (transparent methods)? 6) Has the certainty of evidence been assessed? 7) Have the methods for reaching recommendations been described? 8) Are the recommendations unambiguous? 9) Are the recommendations relevant in your situation? 10) Is there an implementation strategy? | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a English Abstract | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jeppesen, Britta Tendal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Møller, Morten Hylander |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fally, Markus |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brorson, Stig |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ugeskrift for laeger |d 1945 |g 186(2024), 6 vom: 05. Feb. |w (DE-627)NLM000011185 |x 1603-6824 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:186 |g year:2024 |g number:6 |g day:05 |g month:02 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.61409/V09230579 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 186 |j 2024 |e 6 |b 05 |c 02 | ||