Pulmonary vein narrowing after pulsed field versus thermal ablation
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology..
AIMS: When it occurs, pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is associated with significant morbidity. Even mild-to-moderate PV narrowing may have long-term implications. Unlike thermal ablation energies, such as radiofrequency (RF) or cryothermy, pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal modality associated with less fibrotic proliferation. Herein, we compared the effects of PFA vs. thermal ablation on PV narrowing after AF ablation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: ADVENT was a multi-centre, randomized, single-blind study comparing PFA (pentaspline catheter) with thermal ablation-force-sensing RF or cryoballoon (CB)-to treat drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Pulmonary vein diameter and aggregate cross-sectional area were obtained by baseline and 3-month imaging. The pre-specified, formally tested, secondary safety endpoint compared a measure of PV narrowing between PFA vs. thermal groups, with superiority defined by posterior probability > 0.975. Among subjects randomized to PFA (n = 305) or thermal ablation (n = 302), 259 PFA and 255 thermal ablation (137 RF and 118 CB) subjects had complete baseline and 3-month PV imaging. No subject had significant (≥70%) PV stenosis. Change in aggregate PV cross-sectional area was less with PFA (-0.9%) than thermal ablation (-12%, posterior probability > 0.999)-primarily driven by the RF sub-cohort (-19.5%) vs. CB sub-cohort (-3.3%). Almost half of all PFA PV diameters did not decrease, but the majority (80%) of RF PVs decreased, regardless of PV anatomic location.
CONCLUSION: In this first randomized comparison of PFA vs. thermal ablation, PFA resulted in less PV narrowing-thereby underscoring the qualitatively differential and favourable impact of PFA on PV tissue.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:26 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology - 26(2024), 2 vom: 01. Feb. |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Mansour, Moussa [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Atrial fibrillation |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 20.02.2024 Date Revised 21.02.2024 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1093/europace/euae038 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM367948613 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM367948613 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240222091811.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240202s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/europace/euae038 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1301.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM367948613 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38305503 | ||
035 | |a (PII)euae038 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Mansour, Moussa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pulmonary vein narrowing after pulsed field versus thermal ablation |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 20.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. | ||
520 | |a AIMS: When it occurs, pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is associated with significant morbidity. Even mild-to-moderate PV narrowing may have long-term implications. Unlike thermal ablation energies, such as radiofrequency (RF) or cryothermy, pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal modality associated with less fibrotic proliferation. Herein, we compared the effects of PFA vs. thermal ablation on PV narrowing after AF ablation | ||
520 | |a METHODS AND RESULTS: ADVENT was a multi-centre, randomized, single-blind study comparing PFA (pentaspline catheter) with thermal ablation-force-sensing RF or cryoballoon (CB)-to treat drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Pulmonary vein diameter and aggregate cross-sectional area were obtained by baseline and 3-month imaging. The pre-specified, formally tested, secondary safety endpoint compared a measure of PV narrowing between PFA vs. thermal groups, with superiority defined by posterior probability > 0.975. Among subjects randomized to PFA (n = 305) or thermal ablation (n = 302), 259 PFA and 255 thermal ablation (137 RF and 118 CB) subjects had complete baseline and 3-month PV imaging. No subject had significant (≥70%) PV stenosis. Change in aggregate PV cross-sectional area was less with PFA (-0.9%) than thermal ablation (-12%, posterior probability > 0.999)-primarily driven by the RF sub-cohort (-19.5%) vs. CB sub-cohort (-3.3%). Almost half of all PFA PV diameters did not decrease, but the majority (80%) of RF PVs decreased, regardless of PV anatomic location | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: In this first randomized comparison of PFA vs. thermal ablation, PFA resulted in less PV narrowing-thereby underscoring the qualitatively differential and favourable impact of PFA on PV tissue | ||
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Atrial fibrillation | |
650 | 4 | |a Pulmonary vein stenosis | |
650 | 4 | |a Pulsed field ablation | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized controlled trial | |
700 | 1 | |a Gerstenfeld, Edward P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Patel, Chinmay |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Natale, Andrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Whang, William |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cuoco, Frank A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mountantonakis, Stavros E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gibson, Douglas N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Harding, John D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Holland, Scott K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Achyutha, Anitha B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Schneider, Christopher W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mugglin, Andrew S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Albrecht, Elizabeth M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Stein, Kenneth M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lehmann, John W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Reddy, Vivek Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology |d 1999 |g 26(2024), 2 vom: 01. Feb. |w (DE-627)NLM111066492 |x 1532-2092 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:02 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae038 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 26 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 01 |c 02 |