Oxygen-Saturation Targets and Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Adults

Rationale: Among mechanically ventilated critically ill adults, the PILOT (Pragmatic Investigation of Optimal Oxygen Targets) trial demonstrated no difference in ventilator-free days among lower, intermediate, and higher oxygen-saturation targets. The effects on long-term cognition and related outcomes are unknown.Objectives: To compare the effects of lower (90% [range, 88-92%]), intermediate (94% [range, 92-96%]), and higher (98% [range, 96-100%]) oxygen-saturation targets on long-term outcomes.Methods: Twelve months after enrollment in the PILOT trial, blinded neuropsychological raters conducted assessments of cognition, disability, employment status, and quality of life. The primary outcome was global cognition as measured using the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment. In a subset of patients, an expanded neuropsychological battery measured executive function, attention, immediate and delayed memory, verbal fluency, and abstraction.Measurements and Main Results: A total of 501 patients completed follow-up, including 142 in the lower, 186 in the intermediate, and 173 in the higher oxygen target groups. Median (interquartile range) peripheral oxygen saturation values in the lower, intermediate, and higher target groups were 94% (91-96%), 95% (93-97%), and 97% (95-99%), respectively. Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment score did not differ between lower and intermediate (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.36 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.92-2.00]), intermediate and higher (adjusted OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.62-1.29]), or higher and lower (adjusted OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.83-1.79]) target groups. There was also no difference in individual cognitive domains, disability, employment, or quality of life.Conclusions: Among mechanically ventilated critically ill adults who completed follow-up at 12 months, oxygen-saturation targets were not associated with cognition or related outcomes.

Errataetall:

CommentIn: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr 1;209(7):782-784. - PMID 38387023

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2024

Erschienen:

2024

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:209

Enthalten in:

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine - 209(2024), 7 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 861-870

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Mart, Matthew F [VerfasserIn]
Semler, Matthew W [VerfasserIn]
Jenkins, Cathy A [VerfasserIn]
Wang, Guanchao [VerfasserIn]
Casey, Jonathan D [VerfasserIn]
Ely, E Wesley [VerfasserIn]
Jackson, James C [VerfasserIn]
Kiehl, Amy L [VerfasserIn]
Bryant, Patsy T [VerfasserIn]
Pugh, Shannon K [VerfasserIn]
Wang, Li [VerfasserIn]
DeMasi, Stephanie [VerfasserIn]
Rice, Todd W [VerfasserIn]
Bernard, Gordon R [VerfasserIn]
Freundlich, Robert E [VerfasserIn]
Self, Wesley H [VerfasserIn]
Han, Jin H [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Cognitive outcomes
Journal Article
Mechanical ventilation
Oxygen
Oxygenation target
Post–intensive care syndrome
S88TT14065

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 03.04.2024

Date Revised 07.04.2024

published: Print

CommentIn: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr 1;209(7):782-784. - PMID 38387023

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1164/rccm.202310-1826OC

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM367759586