Effect of a 2-week interruption in methotrexate treatment on COVID-19 vaccine response in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (VROOM study) : a randomised, open label, superiority trial
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is the first-line treatment for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and reduces vaccine-induced immunity. We evaluated if a 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment immediately after COVID-19 booster vaccination improved antibody response against the S1 receptor binding domain (S1-RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and live SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation compared with uninterrupted treatment in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
METHOD: We did a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, superiority trial in secondary-care rheumatology and dermatology clinics in 26 hospitals in the UK. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases taking methotrexate (≤25 mg per week) for at least 3 months, who had received two primary vaccine doses from the UK COVID-19 vaccination programme were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using a centralised validated computer program, to temporarily suspend methotrexate treatment for 2 weeks immediately after COVID-19 booster vaccination or continue treatment as usual. The primary outcome was S1-RBD antibody titres 4 weeks after COVID-19 booster vaccination and was assessed masked to group assignment. All randomly assigned patients were included in primary and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN11442263; following a pre-planned interim analysis, recruitment was stopped early.
FINDING: Between Sept 30, 2021, and March 7, 2022, we screened 685 individuals, of whom 383 were randomly assigned: to either suspend methotrexate (n=191; mean age 58·8 years [SD 12·5], 118 [62%] women and 73 [38%] men) or to continue methotrexate (n=192; mean age 59·3 years [11·9], 117 [61%] women and 75 [39%] men). At 4 weeks, the geometric mean S1-RBD antibody titre was 25 413 U/mL (95% CI 22 227-29 056) in the suspend methotrexate group and 12 326 U/mL (10 538-14 418) in the continue methotrexate group with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 2·08 (95% CI 1·59-2·70; p<0·0001). No intervention-related serious adverse events occurred.
INTERPRETATION: 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases enhanced antibody responses after COVID-19 booster vaccination that were sustained at 12 weeks and 26 weeks. There was a temporary increase in inflammatory disease flares, mostly self-managed. The choice to suspend methotrexate should be individualised based on disease status and vulnerability to severe outcomes from COVID-19.
FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:6 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The Lancet. Rheumatology - 6(2024), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite e92-e104 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Abhishek, Abhishek [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
COVID-19 Vaccines |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.01.2024 Date Revised 26.01.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00298-9 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM367575353 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM367575353 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240126232159.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240125s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00298-9 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1271.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM367575353 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38267107 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S2665-9913(23)00298-9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Abhishek, Abhishek |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of a 2-week interruption in methotrexate treatment on COVID-19 vaccine response in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (VROOM study) |b a randomised, open label, superiority trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 26.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is the first-line treatment for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and reduces vaccine-induced immunity. We evaluated if a 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment immediately after COVID-19 booster vaccination improved antibody response against the S1 receptor binding domain (S1-RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and live SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation compared with uninterrupted treatment in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases | ||
520 | |a METHOD: We did a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, superiority trial in secondary-care rheumatology and dermatology clinics in 26 hospitals in the UK. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases taking methotrexate (≤25 mg per week) for at least 3 months, who had received two primary vaccine doses from the UK COVID-19 vaccination programme were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using a centralised validated computer program, to temporarily suspend methotrexate treatment for 2 weeks immediately after COVID-19 booster vaccination or continue treatment as usual. The primary outcome was S1-RBD antibody titres 4 weeks after COVID-19 booster vaccination and was assessed masked to group assignment. All randomly assigned patients were included in primary and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN11442263; following a pre-planned interim analysis, recruitment was stopped early | ||
520 | |a FINDING: Between Sept 30, 2021, and March 7, 2022, we screened 685 individuals, of whom 383 were randomly assigned: to either suspend methotrexate (n=191; mean age 58·8 years [SD 12·5], 118 [62%] women and 73 [38%] men) or to continue methotrexate (n=192; mean age 59·3 years [11·9], 117 [61%] women and 75 [39%] men). At 4 weeks, the geometric mean S1-RBD antibody titre was 25 413 U/mL (95% CI 22 227-29 056) in the suspend methotrexate group and 12 326 U/mL (10 538-14 418) in the continue methotrexate group with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 2·08 (95% CI 1·59-2·70; p<0·0001). No intervention-related serious adverse events occurred | ||
520 | |a INTERPRETATION: 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases enhanced antibody responses after COVID-19 booster vaccination that were sustained at 12 weeks and 26 weeks. There was a temporary increase in inflammatory disease flares, mostly self-managed. The choice to suspend methotrexate should be individualised based on disease status and vulnerability to severe outcomes from COVID-19 | ||
520 | |a FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research | ||
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a COVID-19 Vaccines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a spike protein, SARS-CoV-2 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Methotrexate |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a YL5FZ2Y5U1 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Peckham, Nicholas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pade, Corinna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gibbons, Joseph M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cureton, Lucy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Francis, Anne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Barber, Vicki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Williams, Jennifer A E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Appelbe, Duncan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Eldridge, Lucy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Julier, Patrick |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Altmann, Daniel M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bluett, James |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Brooks, Tim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Coates, Laura C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rombach, Ines |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Semper, Amanda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Otter, Ashley |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Valdes, Ana M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Williams, Hywel C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Boyton, Rosemary J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a McKnight, Áine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cook, Jonathan A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a VROOM study investigators |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pande, Ira |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tang, Ting Seng |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tran, Gui |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Layton, Alison |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Price, Elizabeth |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Whittam, Lindsay |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Venkatachalam, Srinivasan |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Huws, Gwenan |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pratt, Arthur |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Reynolds, Nick J |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Youngstein, Taryn |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Walsh, David A |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Joseph, Theresa |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mathew, Rengi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Oikonomou, Stamatios |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Gwynne, Catherine |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Crowder, Rory |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Saravanan, Vadivelu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mustafa, Alaa |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tacu, Cristina |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a George, Emmanuel |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Batty, Thomas |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Soni, Anushka |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Horton, Sarah |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Gaffney, Karl |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Gullick, Nicola |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lapin, Agnieszka |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bingham, Sarah |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Madan, Ayesha |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Holroyd, Chris |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lwin, May |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Khalid, Salema |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Green, Mike |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hunt, Laura |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Alcorn, Nicola |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ellis, Rob |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hider, Samantha |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hassan, Ala |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Douglas, Karen |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ho, Gen Nen |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Levasseur, Kirsty |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pradeep, John |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Rhys-Dillon, Ceril |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Jones, Catrin |e investigator |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Lancet. Rheumatology |d 2019 |g 6(2024), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite e92-e104 |w (DE-627)NLM308660307 |x 2665-9913 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:01 |g pages:e92-e104 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00298-9 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 6 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 01 |c 01 |h e92-e104 |