Adherence to quality indicators and best practices in surveillance endoscopy of Barrett's esophagus : A video-based assessment
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)..
Background and study aims Adherence to quality indicators (QIs) and best practices (BPs) for endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is low based on clinical documentation which is an inaccurate representation of events occurring during procedures. This study aimed to assess adherence to measurable QI and BP using video evaluation. Methods We performed a single center video-based retrospective review of surveillance endoscopies performed for BE ≥1 cm between March 1, 2018 and October 1, 2020. Adherence to QIs and BPs was assessed through video review and documentation. Videos were evaluated by five gastroenterologists. Interrater variability was determined using 10 videos before reviewing the remaining 128 videos. A generalized linear regression model was used to determine predictors of adherence to QIs and BPs. Results There were 138 endoscopies reviewed. Inspection with virtual chromoendoscopy (VC) occurred in 75 cases (54%) on video review with documentation in 50 of these cases (67%). Adherence to the Seattle protocol (SP) occurred in 74 cases (54%) on video review with documentation in 28 of these cases (38%). Use of VC or the SP was documented but not observed on video review in 16 (12%) and 30 (22%) cases, respectively. Length of BE was associated with increased use of the Prague classification (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.37) while years in practice was associated with a decreased likelihood of VC use (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.99). Conclusions This study validates prior data demonstrating poor adherence to QIs and BPs and highlights discrepancies between clinical documentation and events occurring during procedures.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Endoscopy international open - 12(2024), 1 vom: 20. Jan., Seite E90-E96 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Enke, Thomas [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Barrett's and adenocarcinoma |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 23.01.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1055/a-2226-3689 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM367406551 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM367406551 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240123232054.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240122s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1055/a-2226-3689 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1268.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM367406551 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38250164 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Enke, Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Adherence to quality indicators and best practices in surveillance endoscopy of Barrett's esophagus |b A video-based assessment |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 23.01.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | ||
| 520 | |a Background and study aims Adherence to quality indicators (QIs) and best practices (BPs) for endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is low based on clinical documentation which is an inaccurate representation of events occurring during procedures. This study aimed to assess adherence to measurable QI and BP using video evaluation. Methods We performed a single center video-based retrospective review of surveillance endoscopies performed for BE ≥1 cm between March 1, 2018 and October 1, 2020. Adherence to QIs and BPs was assessed through video review and documentation. Videos were evaluated by five gastroenterologists. Interrater variability was determined using 10 videos before reviewing the remaining 128 videos. A generalized linear regression model was used to determine predictors of adherence to QIs and BPs. Results There were 138 endoscopies reviewed. Inspection with virtual chromoendoscopy (VC) occurred in 75 cases (54%) on video review with documentation in 50 of these cases (67%). Adherence to the Seattle protocol (SP) occurred in 74 cases (54%) on video review with documentation in 28 of these cases (38%). Use of VC or the SP was documented but not observed on video review in 16 (12%) and 30 (22%) cases, respectively. Length of BE was associated with increased use of the Prague classification (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.37) while years in practice was associated with a decreased likelihood of VC use (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.99). Conclusions This study validates prior data demonstrating poor adherence to QIs and BPs and highlights discrepancies between clinical documentation and events occurring during procedures | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Barrett's and adenocarcinoma | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality and logistical aspects | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Keswani, Rajesh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Triggs, Joseph |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gannavarapu, Bhargava |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mittal, Chetan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sinha, Jasmine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kwasny, Mary J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Komanduri, Srinadh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Endoscopy international open |d 2013 |g 12(2024), 1 vom: 20. Jan., Seite E90-E96 |w (DE-627)NLM250509881 |x 2364-3722 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:20 |g month:01 |g pages:E90-E96 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2226-3689 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 12 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 20 |c 01 |h E90-E96 | ||