Why Are There So Few Basidiomycota and Basal Fungi as Endophytes? A Review
A review of selected studies on fungal endophytes confirms the paucity of Basidiomycota and basal fungi, with almost 90% attributed to Ascomycota. Reasons for the low number of Basidiomycota and basal fungi, including the Chytridiomycota, Mucoromycota, and Mortierellomycota, are advanced, including isolation procedure and media, incubation period and the slow growth of basidiomycetes, the identification of non-sporulating isolates, endophyte competition, and fungus-host interactions. We compare the detection of endophytes through culture-dependent methods and culture-independent methods, the role of fungi on senescence of the host plant, and next-generation studies.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:10 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) - 10(2024), 1 vom: 15. Jan. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Rungjindamai, Nattawut [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Basal fungi |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 29.01.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/jof10010067 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM36739474X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM36739474X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240129232111.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240122s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/jof10010067 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1274.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM36739474X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38248976 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)67 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rungjindamai, Nattawut |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why Are There So Few Basidiomycota and Basal Fungi as Endophytes? A Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 29.01.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a A review of selected studies on fungal endophytes confirms the paucity of Basidiomycota and basal fungi, with almost 90% attributed to Ascomycota. Reasons for the low number of Basidiomycota and basal fungi, including the Chytridiomycota, Mucoromycota, and Mortierellomycota, are advanced, including isolation procedure and media, incubation period and the slow growth of basidiomycetes, the identification of non-sporulating isolates, endophyte competition, and fungus-host interactions. We compare the detection of endophytes through culture-dependent methods and culture-independent methods, the role of fungi on senescence of the host plant, and next-generation studies | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a basal fungi | |
| 650 | 4 | |a basidiomycota | |
| 650 | 4 | |a endophytes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fungal diversity | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jones, E B Gareth |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) |d 2014 |g 10(2024), 1 vom: 15. Jan. |w (DE-627)NLM25748468X |x 2309-608X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:15 |g month:01 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof10010067 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 10 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 15 |c 01 | ||