Factors associated with the outcome of root canal treatment-A cohort study conducted in a private practice
© 2024 The Authors. International Endodontic Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Endodontic Society..
AIM: To investigate the association of various pre-, intra- and post-operative factors on root canal treatment outcome.
METHODOLOGY: In this cohort study, primary or secondary root canal treatment of mature permanent teeth was performed by a single endodontist in a private practice over 13 years, and followed 1-4 years after treatment. Treatment details and clinical and radiographic data were collected. The proportion of successfully treated teeth and roots based on strict radiographic (periapical index (PAI) ≤2) and clinical criteria (absence of pain, swelling or sinus tract) was estimated. To evaluate joint associations of prognostic factors and treatment success probability, 44 pre, intra- and post-operative factors were investigated using bivariate associations, and a multiple logistic regression model was fitted using Generalized Estimating Equations.
RESULTS: 1259 teeth (2445 roots, 3149 canals) were assessed with a recall rate of 91%. The proportion of successfully treated teeth was 79.9% [95% confidence interval 77.7-82.1]. Eleven prognostic factors were identified that significantly reduced the odds ratio (OR) for treatment success at tooth level. Six were preoperative: injury history (OR = 0.05[0.01-0.24]), root PAI (OR = 0.29[0.20-0.42], 0.21[0.13-0.34] and 0.22[0.12-0.42] for PAI = 3, 4 and 5, respectively, against PAI = 1), lesion diameter (OR = 0.30[0.21-0.43] and 0.24[0.16-0.37] for diameters of 1-5 mm and ≥6 mm, respectively, against no lesion), tooth type (OR = 0.51[0.27-0.97] and OR = 0.45[0.24-0.83] for premolars and molars, respectively, against incisors or canines), tenderness to periapical palpation (OR = 0.64[0.43-0.94]) and two canals per root (OR = 0.67[0.54-0.83]). Four factors were intraoperative: root filling of unsatisfactory quality (OR = 0.18[0.08-0.40]) or extending beyond or shorter than 2 mm from the apex (OR = 0.44[0.26-0.75] and 0.62[0.40-0.97] respectively), resin sealer (OR = 0.58[0.39-0.87] against bioceramic sealer) and single visit treatment (OR = 0.40[0.21-0.75] against multiple visits). One factor was post-operative: defective coronal restoration (OR = 0.35[0.21-0.56]).
CONCLUSION: The following factors were associated with unsuccessful root canal treatment: (i) history of injury, apical periodontitis with increased severity (larger lesion, higher PAI, tenderness to periapical palpation), or complicated anatomic conditions (premolar or molar, two canals in a single root); (ii) technically suboptimal root filling (of unsatisfactory quality or not ending within 2 mm of radiographic apex) performed in a single-visit, or use of resin sealer instead of novel bioceramic sealer; (iii) suboptimal quality coronal restoration.
Errataetall: | |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:57 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
International endodontic journal - 57(2024), 4 vom: 19. März, Seite 377-393 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Jurič, Rok [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Journal Article |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 07.03.2024 Date Revised 21.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic CommentIn: Br Dent J. 2024 Feb;236(4):309. - PMID 38388607 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/iej.14022 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM367344017 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM367344017 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240321235908.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240121s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/iej.14022 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1338.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM367344017 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38243912 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Jurič, Rok |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Factors associated with the outcome of root canal treatment-A cohort study conducted in a private practice |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 07.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: Br Dent J. 2024 Feb;236(4):309. - PMID 38388607 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2024 The Authors. International Endodontic Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Endodontic Society. | ||
520 | |a AIM: To investigate the association of various pre-, intra- and post-operative factors on root canal treatment outcome | ||
520 | |a METHODOLOGY: In this cohort study, primary or secondary root canal treatment of mature permanent teeth was performed by a single endodontist in a private practice over 13 years, and followed 1-4 years after treatment. Treatment details and clinical and radiographic data were collected. The proportion of successfully treated teeth and roots based on strict radiographic (periapical index (PAI) ≤2) and clinical criteria (absence of pain, swelling or sinus tract) was estimated. To evaluate joint associations of prognostic factors and treatment success probability, 44 pre, intra- and post-operative factors were investigated using bivariate associations, and a multiple logistic regression model was fitted using Generalized Estimating Equations | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: 1259 teeth (2445 roots, 3149 canals) were assessed with a recall rate of 91%. The proportion of successfully treated teeth was 79.9% [95% confidence interval 77.7-82.1]. Eleven prognostic factors were identified that significantly reduced the odds ratio (OR) for treatment success at tooth level. Six were preoperative: injury history (OR = 0.05[0.01-0.24]), root PAI (OR = 0.29[0.20-0.42], 0.21[0.13-0.34] and 0.22[0.12-0.42] for PAI = 3, 4 and 5, respectively, against PAI = 1), lesion diameter (OR = 0.30[0.21-0.43] and 0.24[0.16-0.37] for diameters of 1-5 mm and ≥6 mm, respectively, against no lesion), tooth type (OR = 0.51[0.27-0.97] and OR = 0.45[0.24-0.83] for premolars and molars, respectively, against incisors or canines), tenderness to periapical palpation (OR = 0.64[0.43-0.94]) and two canals per root (OR = 0.67[0.54-0.83]). Four factors were intraoperative: root filling of unsatisfactory quality (OR = 0.18[0.08-0.40]) or extending beyond or shorter than 2 mm from the apex (OR = 0.44[0.26-0.75] and 0.62[0.40-0.97] respectively), resin sealer (OR = 0.58[0.39-0.87] against bioceramic sealer) and single visit treatment (OR = 0.40[0.21-0.75] against multiple visits). One factor was post-operative: defective coronal restoration (OR = 0.35[0.21-0.56]) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The following factors were associated with unsuccessful root canal treatment: (i) history of injury, apical periodontitis with increased severity (larger lesion, higher PAI, tenderness to periapical palpation), or complicated anatomic conditions (premolar or molar, two canals in a single root); (ii) technically suboptimal root filling (of unsatisfactory quality or not ending within 2 mm of radiographic apex) performed in a single-visit, or use of resin sealer instead of novel bioceramic sealer; (iii) suboptimal quality coronal restoration | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a outcome assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a periapical periodontitis | |
650 | 4 | |a root canal therapy | |
650 | 4 | |a treatment outcome | |
700 | 1 | |a Vidmar, G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Blagus, R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jan, Janja |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International endodontic journal |d 1993 |g 57(2024), 4 vom: 19. März, Seite 377-393 |w (DE-627)NLM012723207 |x 1365-2591 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:57 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g day:19 |g month:03 |g pages:377-393 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.14022 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 57 |j 2024 |e 4 |b 19 |c 03 |h 377-393 |