Treatment of ocular rosacea : a systematic review
© 2024 The Authors. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft..
Rosacea is a common chronic skin disease distributed primarily around the central face. Ocular manifestations of rosacea are poorly studied, and estimates of prevalence vary widely, ranging from 6% to 72% in the rosacea population. Treatment options for ocular rosacea include lid hygiene, topical and oral antibiotics, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, oral vitamin A derivatives, and intense pulsed light; however, a direct comparison of treatment methods for ocular rosacea is lacking. This review aims to compare treatment efficacy and adverse events for different treatment modalities in ocular rosacea. We performed a systematic review by searching Cochrane, MEDLINE and Embase. Title, abstract, full text screening, and data extraction were done in duplicate. Sixty-six articles met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 1,275 patients. The most effective treatment modalities were topical antimicrobials and oral antibiotics, which achieved complete or partial response in 91% (n = 82/90) and 89% (n = 525/580) of patients respectively, followed by intense pulsed light (89%, n = 97/109 partial response), cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion (87% n = 40/46), and lid hygiene (65%, n = 67/105). Combination treatments achieved a complete or partial response in 90% (n = 69/77). Results suggest that topical antimicrobials, oral antibiotics, intense pulsed light. and cyclosporine were the most efficacious single modality treatments.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:22 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG - 22(2024), 2 vom: 16. Feb., Seite 167-174 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Avraham, Shani [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
83HN0GTJ6D |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.02.2024 Date Revised 19.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/ddg.15290 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM367343584 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM367343584 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240219232009.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240121s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/ddg.15290 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1299.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM367343584 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38243868 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Avraham, Shani |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Treatment of ocular rosacea |b a systematic review |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 19.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 19.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2024 The Authors. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft. | ||
520 | |a Rosacea is a common chronic skin disease distributed primarily around the central face. Ocular manifestations of rosacea are poorly studied, and estimates of prevalence vary widely, ranging from 6% to 72% in the rosacea population. Treatment options for ocular rosacea include lid hygiene, topical and oral antibiotics, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, oral vitamin A derivatives, and intense pulsed light; however, a direct comparison of treatment methods for ocular rosacea is lacking. This review aims to compare treatment efficacy and adverse events for different treatment modalities in ocular rosacea. We performed a systematic review by searching Cochrane, MEDLINE and Embase. Title, abstract, full text screening, and data extraction were done in duplicate. Sixty-six articles met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 1,275 patients. The most effective treatment modalities were topical antimicrobials and oral antibiotics, which achieved complete or partial response in 91% (n = 82/90) and 89% (n = 525/580) of patients respectively, followed by intense pulsed light (89%, n = 97/109 partial response), cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion (87% n = 40/46), and lid hygiene (65%, n = 67/105). Combination treatments achieved a complete or partial response in 90% (n = 69/77). Results suggest that topical antimicrobials, oral antibiotics, intense pulsed light. and cyclosporine were the most efficacious single modality treatments | ||
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a IPL | |
650 | 4 | |a Rosacea | |
650 | 4 | |a adverse events | |
650 | 4 | |a doxycycline | |
650 | 4 | |a isotretinoin | |
650 | 4 | |a ocular | |
650 | 4 | |a treatment | |
650 | 7 | |a Emulsions |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Anti-Bacterial Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Cyclosporine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 83HN0GTJ6D |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Khaslavsky, Sophie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kashetsky, Nadia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Starkey, Samantha Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zaslavsky, Kirill |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lam, Joseph M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mukovozov, Ilya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG |d 2003 |g 22(2024), 2 vom: 16. Feb., Seite 167-174 |w (DE-627)NLM155366637 |x 1610-0387 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:16 |g month:02 |g pages:167-174 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15290 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 22 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 16 |c 02 |h 167-174 |