Comparison of Particulate Steroid Injection vs Nonparticulate Steroid Injection for Lumbar Radicular Pain : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Copyright © 2024 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the difference on pain intensity and disability between particulate and nonparticulate steroid injections in patients with lumbar radicular pain. Subgroup analysis by study design, type of particulate steroid, and follow-up duration were performed.
DATA SOURCES: We performed the literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up March, 2023.
STUDY SELECTION: Studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies, that compared particulate steroid injection and nonparticulate steroid injection in patients with lumbar radicular pain were independently reviewed by 2 reviewers for eligibility for inclusion.
DATA EXTRACTION: Outcomes of interest were pain intensity and disability. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2.0) tool for RCTs and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions Tool (ROBINS-I) for nonrandomized studies. Effect sizes were estimated using mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD).
DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed no significant difference in visual analog scale, disability score and the numbers of patients with 50% pain reduction between particulate and nonparticulate steroid injection groups (P>.05). Particulate steroid injections showed significant better effect in pain scale in RCTs (MD=0.62; 95% CI 0.08-1.16, P=.02). In subgroup analysis with steroid types, methylprednisolone showed better effect compared with dexamethasone, while dexamethasone showed better effect compared with betamethasone.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested no significant differences between the particulate and nonparticulate steroid groups in pain or disability score. Therefore, considering the safety profile of nonparticulate steroids, nonparticulate steroid injection may be helpful in patients with lumbar radicular pain.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation - (2024) vom: 17. Jan. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Kim, Seong Jun [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Epidural |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 10.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.apmr.2024.01.002 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM367327872 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM367327872 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240210233139.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240120s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.01.002 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1287.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM367327872 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38242297 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0003-9993(24)00034-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kim, Seong Jun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Particulate Steroid Injection vs Nonparticulate Steroid Injection for Lumbar Radicular Pain |b A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 10.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the difference on pain intensity and disability between particulate and nonparticulate steroid injections in patients with lumbar radicular pain. Subgroup analysis by study design, type of particulate steroid, and follow-up duration were performed | ||
| 520 | |a DATA SOURCES: We performed the literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up March, 2023 | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY SELECTION: Studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies, that compared particulate steroid injection and nonparticulate steroid injection in patients with lumbar radicular pain were independently reviewed by 2 reviewers for eligibility for inclusion | ||
| 520 | |a DATA EXTRACTION: Outcomes of interest were pain intensity and disability. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2.0) tool for RCTs and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions Tool (ROBINS-I) for nonrandomized studies. Effect sizes were estimated using mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) | ||
| 520 | |a DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed no significant difference in visual analog scale, disability score and the numbers of patients with 50% pain reduction between particulate and nonparticulate steroid injection groups (P>.05). Particulate steroid injections showed significant better effect in pain scale in RCTs (MD=0.62; 95% CI 0.08-1.16, P=.02). In subgroup analysis with steroid types, methylprednisolone showed better effect compared with dexamethasone, while dexamethasone showed better effect compared with betamethasone | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested no significant differences between the particulate and nonparticulate steroid groups in pain or disability score. Therefore, considering the safety profile of nonparticulate steroids, nonparticulate steroid injection may be helpful in patients with lumbar radicular pain | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epidural | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Injections | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Low back pain | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nonparticulate | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Particulate | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Radicular pain | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Randomized controlled trials | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Steroids | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Park, Jong Mi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Yong Wook |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yoon, Seo Yeon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Sang Chul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |d 1945 |g (2024) vom: 17. Jan. |w (DE-627)NLM000380490 |x 1532-821X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:17 |g month:01 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.01.002 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 17 |c 01 | ||