Planned Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as Alternative for Colorectal Neoplasms : A Propensity Score-Matched Study
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature..
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD), a modified ESD with a snare, has become increasingly utilized to overcome the limitations of conventional ESD (C-ESD). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Planned H-ESD and C-ESD for colorectal lesions.
METHODS: Propensity score matching was performed to control for confounding variables in this retrospective study. Outcomes included en bloc resection and complete resection (R0) rates, procedure time, adverse event rates, and local recurrence rate.
RESULTS: 1286 lesions were enrolled in the study. After matching, 263 lesions were assigned to each group. The Planned H-ESD group has lower en bloc rate but similar R0 resection rate compared to the C-ESD group (90.9% vs 98.1%, P = 0.001; 77.2% vs 77.9%, P = 0.917). The median procedure time was shorter in the Planned H-ESD group (27.0 min vs 35.0 min, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in adverse events rates or local recurrence rate. Subgroup analysis based on lesion size revealed that a significantly lower en bloc resection rate in the Planned H-ESD group compared to the C-ESD group for lesions ≥ 40 mm (71.0% vs 94.3%, P = 0.027), but there was no significant difference for lesions < 40 mm.
CONCLUSION: The Planned H-ESD has a lower en bloc resection rate but a similar R0 resection rate, adverse event rates, local recurrence rate, and shorter procedure duration. Compared to C-ESD, Planned H-ESD presents advantages for managing colorectal neoplasms below 40 mm.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:69 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Digestive diseases and sciences - 69(2024), 3 vom: 31. März, Seite 949-960 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhang, Yu-Xin [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Colorectal neoplasms |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.03.2024 Date Revised 25.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s10620-023-08195-7 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM367092832 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM367092832 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240325234633.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240114s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10620-023-08195-7 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1346.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM367092832 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38218733 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zhang, Yu-Xin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Planned Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as Alternative for Colorectal Neoplasms |b A Propensity Score-Matched Study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 25.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD), a modified ESD with a snare, has become increasingly utilized to overcome the limitations of conventional ESD (C-ESD). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Planned H-ESD and C-ESD for colorectal lesions | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Propensity score matching was performed to control for confounding variables in this retrospective study. Outcomes included en bloc resection and complete resection (R0) rates, procedure time, adverse event rates, and local recurrence rate | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: 1286 lesions were enrolled in the study. After matching, 263 lesions were assigned to each group. The Planned H-ESD group has lower en bloc rate but similar R0 resection rate compared to the C-ESD group (90.9% vs 98.1%, P = 0.001; 77.2% vs 77.9%, P = 0.917). The median procedure time was shorter in the Planned H-ESD group (27.0 min vs 35.0 min, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in adverse events rates or local recurrence rate. Subgroup analysis based on lesion size revealed that a significantly lower en bloc resection rate in the Planned H-ESD group compared to the C-ESD group for lesions ≥ 40 mm (71.0% vs 94.3%, P = 0.027), but there was no significant difference for lesions < 40 mm | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The Planned H-ESD has a lower en bloc resection rate but a similar R0 resection rate, adverse event rates, local recurrence rate, and shorter procedure duration. Compared to C-ESD, Planned H-ESD presents advantages for managing colorectal neoplasms below 40 mm | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Colorectal neoplasms | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Endoscopic submucosal dissection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Propensity score | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Xun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gu, Fang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ding, Shi-Gang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Digestive diseases and sciences |d 1989 |g 69(2024), 3 vom: 31. März, Seite 949-960 |w (DE-627)NLM000356492 |x 1573-2568 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:69 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:31 |g month:03 |g pages:949-960 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-08195-7 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 69 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 31 |c 03 |h 949-960 | ||