Uncovering gaps in GRADE reporting of Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) guidelines
Published by Elsevier Inc..
OBJECTIVES: To formally evaluate the uptake and reporting of the Grading of Recommendation Assessments, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) developed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Based on an a priori, written protocol, we developed a dedicated data abstraction form that included the six suggested criteria for using and applying GRADE. By searching the EAST website, we identified all EAST guidelines that referenced the use of GRADE. All steps of the data abstraction process were completed independently and in duplicate by two members of the research team.
RESULTS: We identified a total of 48 CPGs that used GRADE. Trauma and violence prevention (n = 11; 23.9%) was the most common topic. The median number of patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions addressed was 3 (interquartile range: 2; 4) with a median of 2.5 (interquartile range: 1; 4) critical outcomes. A conditional/weak recommendation was provided for n = 79 (51.4%) PICOs, whereas a strong recommendation was provided for 33 PICOs (23.9%). For 22 PICOs (15.9%), no recommendation was made. Nearly all guideline documents provided search dates (n = 44; 95.7%) and a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram (n = 44; 95.7%). Most described categories for rating down (n = 35; 76.1%). GRADE decision-making domains related to the ratio of benefits to harms, values and preferences, and resource utilization were referenced by 43.5% (n = 20), 43.5% (n = 20), and 30.4% (n = 14) of CPGs, respectively. For nearly half of PICO questions (n = 59; 44.2%) authors did not provide an evidence profile or summary of findings table. Comparing time periods from 2014-2018 to 2019-2022, the proportion of recommendations with an overall certainty of evidence increased (52.4% vs 83.9%; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: EAST has successfully adopted GRADE to develop many trauma-related guidelines, each addressing a finite number of focused clinical questions based on systematic reviews conducted in-house. Overall reporting improved over time. There is for improvement when it comes to consistent provision of an overall certainty of evidence, the reporting of the evidence to decision-making process, and the justification of strong recommendations based on low/very low certainty evidence.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:169 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of clinical epidemiology - 169(2024) vom: 12. Jan., Seite 111260 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Norling, Brett [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Certainty of evidence |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 02.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111260 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM367090082 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM367090082 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240403235231.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240114s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111260 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1363.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM367090082 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38218460 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0895-4356(24)00015-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Norling, Brett |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Uncovering gaps in GRADE reporting of Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) guidelines |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 02.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a Published by Elsevier Inc. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVES: To formally evaluate the uptake and reporting of the Grading of Recommendation Assessments, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) developed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Based on an a priori, written protocol, we developed a dedicated data abstraction form that included the six suggested criteria for using and applying GRADE. By searching the EAST website, we identified all EAST guidelines that referenced the use of GRADE. All steps of the data abstraction process were completed independently and in duplicate by two members of the research team | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: We identified a total of 48 CPGs that used GRADE. Trauma and violence prevention (n = 11; 23.9%) was the most common topic. The median number of patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions addressed was 3 (interquartile range: 2; 4) with a median of 2.5 (interquartile range: 1; 4) critical outcomes. A conditional/weak recommendation was provided for n = 79 (51.4%) PICOs, whereas a strong recommendation was provided for 33 PICOs (23.9%). For 22 PICOs (15.9%), no recommendation was made. Nearly all guideline documents provided search dates (n = 44; 95.7%) and a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram (n = 44; 95.7%). Most described categories for rating down (n = 35; 76.1%). GRADE decision-making domains related to the ratio of benefits to harms, values and preferences, and resource utilization were referenced by 43.5% (n = 20), 43.5% (n = 20), and 30.4% (n = 14) of CPGs, respectively. For nearly half of PICO questions (n = 59; 44.2%) authors did not provide an evidence profile or summary of findings table. Comparing time periods from 2014-2018 to 2019-2022, the proportion of recommendations with an overall certainty of evidence increased (52.4% vs 83.9%; P < 0.001) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: EAST has successfully adopted GRADE to develop many trauma-related guidelines, each addressing a finite number of focused clinical questions based on systematic reviews conducted in-house. Overall reporting improved over time. There is for improvement when it comes to consistent provision of an overall certainty of evidence, the reporting of the evidence to decision-making process, and the justification of strong recommendations based on low/very low certainty evidence | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Certainty of evidence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evidence-based medicine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a GRADE | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Guideline development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Guidelines | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research reporting | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miller, William |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dahm, Philipp |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of clinical epidemiology |d 1991 |g 169(2024) vom: 12. Jan., Seite 111260 |w (DE-627)NLM012614815 |x 1878-5921 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:169 |g year:2024 |g day:12 |g month:01 |g pages:111260 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111260 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 169 |j 2024 |b 12 |c 01 |h 111260 | ||