Optimizing CO2 field flooding during sternotomy : In vitro confirmation of the Karolinska studies
Copyright: © 2024 Puthettu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited..
Although CO2 field-flooding was first used during cardiac surgery more than 60 years ago, its efficacy is still disputed. The invisible nature of the gas and the difficulty in determining the "safe" quantity to protect the patient are two of the main obstacles to overcome for its validation. Moreover, CO2 concentration in the chest cavity is highly sensitive to procedural aspects, such suction and hand movements. Based on our review of the existing literature, we identified four major factors that influence the intra-cavity CO2 concentration during open-heart surgery: type of delivery device (diffuser), delivery CO2 flow rate, diffuser position around the wound cavity, and its orientation inside the cavity. In this initial study, only steady state conditions were considered to establish a basic understanding on the effect of the four above-mentioned factors. Transient factors, such as suction or hand movements, will be reported separately.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:19 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
PloS one - 19(2024), 1 vom: 31., Seite e0292669 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Puthettu, Mira [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.01.2024 Date Revised 11.01.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1371/journal.pone.0292669 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM366850288 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM366850288 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240114233930.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240114s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0292669 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1256.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM366850288 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38194426 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Puthettu, Mira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Optimizing CO2 field flooding during sternotomy |b In vitro confirmation of the Karolinska studies |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 11.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 11.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright: © 2024 Puthettu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | ||
520 | |a Although CO2 field-flooding was first used during cardiac surgery more than 60 years ago, its efficacy is still disputed. The invisible nature of the gas and the difficulty in determining the "safe" quantity to protect the patient are two of the main obstacles to overcome for its validation. Moreover, CO2 concentration in the chest cavity is highly sensitive to procedural aspects, such suction and hand movements. Based on our review of the existing literature, we identified four major factors that influence the intra-cavity CO2 concentration during open-heart surgery: type of delivery device (diffuser), delivery CO2 flow rate, diffuser position around the wound cavity, and its orientation inside the cavity. In this initial study, only steady state conditions were considered to establish a basic understanding on the effect of the four above-mentioned factors. Transient factors, such as suction or hand movements, will be reported separately | ||
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a Carbon Dioxide |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 142M471B3J |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Vandenberghe, Stijn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Balafas, Spyros |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Di Serio, Clelia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Singjeli, Geni |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pagnamenta, Alberto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Demertzis, Stefanos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t PloS one |d 2006 |g 19(2024), 1 vom: 31., Seite e0292669 |w (DE-627)NLM167327399 |x 1932-6203 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:31 |g pages:e0292669 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292669 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 19 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 31 |h e0292669 |