Prostatic urethral lift for subjects in urinary retention (PULSAR) : 12-Month results of a prospective controlled trial compared with real-world outcomes
© 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company..
Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) in acute urinary retention (AUR) patients within a controlled (PULSAR) and real-world setting (Real-World Retrospective study).
Materials and methods: PULSAR was a 12-month prospective study of PUL in AUR patients (n = 51) performed at six centres in the United Kingdom; enrolled BPH patients aged ≥50 years, with prostate volume of ≤100 cc. AUR was defined as being catheter dependent with at least one prior failed trial without catheter (TWOC) while on an alpha-blocker. RWR consisted of 3226 consecutive PUL patients across 22 international sites treated between July 2017 and March 2020; 469 of whom were in urinary retention (RWRr), that is, catheter-dependent at the time of their procedure. Symptom response, uroflow and catheter independence rates were compared between PULSAR and RWRr subjects. A logistical regression model was constructed to evaluate patient baseline and dynamic factors predicting success after the procedure.
Results: Seventy-three percent of PULSAR subjects were catheter independent and free from surgical reintervention at 12 months post-PUL. Success was associated with higher voiding efficiency during the perioperative period. Slightly higher catheter-independent rates (80%) were seen in RWRr patients; variables that influenced success included age <70 years, lower baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA), lower baseline post-void residual (PVR) and shorter pre-procedural catheter duration. Logistic regression of the combined PULSAR and RWRr retention groups revealed that procedural age <70 years and higher bladder voiding efficiency (BVE) were associated with success.
Conclusions: Lower baseline PSA and PVR, younger age and shorter pre-procedure catheter durations drove successful outcomes in AUR patients undergoing PUL. Post-PUL voiding efficiencies may help ascertain long-term response to treatment.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:5 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
BJUI compass - 5(2024), 1 vom: 22. Jan., Seite 60-69 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Rochester, Mark [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Acute urinary retention |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 06.01.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1002/bco2.280 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM366696343 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM366696343 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240108142704.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240108s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/bco2.280 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1250.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM366696343 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38179018 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rochester, Mark |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prostatic urethral lift for subjects in urinary retention (PULSAR) |b 12-Month results of a prospective controlled trial compared with real-world outcomes |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 06.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. | ||
520 | |a Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) in acute urinary retention (AUR) patients within a controlled (PULSAR) and real-world setting (Real-World Retrospective study) | ||
520 | |a Materials and methods: PULSAR was a 12-month prospective study of PUL in AUR patients (n = 51) performed at six centres in the United Kingdom; enrolled BPH patients aged ≥50 years, with prostate volume of ≤100 cc. AUR was defined as being catheter dependent with at least one prior failed trial without catheter (TWOC) while on an alpha-blocker. RWR consisted of 3226 consecutive PUL patients across 22 international sites treated between July 2017 and March 2020; 469 of whom were in urinary retention (RWRr), that is, catheter-dependent at the time of their procedure. Symptom response, uroflow and catheter independence rates were compared between PULSAR and RWRr subjects. A logistical regression model was constructed to evaluate patient baseline and dynamic factors predicting success after the procedure | ||
520 | |a Results: Seventy-three percent of PULSAR subjects were catheter independent and free from surgical reintervention at 12 months post-PUL. Success was associated with higher voiding efficiency during the perioperative period. Slightly higher catheter-independent rates (80%) were seen in RWRr patients; variables that influenced success included age <70 years, lower baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA), lower baseline post-void residual (PVR) and shorter pre-procedural catheter duration. Logistic regression of the combined PULSAR and RWRr retention groups revealed that procedural age <70 years and higher bladder voiding efficiency (BVE) were associated with success | ||
520 | |a Conclusions: Lower baseline PSA and PVR, younger age and shorter pre-procedure catheter durations drove successful outcomes in AUR patients undergoing PUL. Post-PUL voiding efficiencies may help ascertain long-term response to treatment | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a acute urinary retention | |
650 | 4 | |a benign prostatic hypertrophy | |
650 | 4 | |a bladder outflow obstruction | |
650 | 4 | |a bladder voiding efficiency | |
650 | 4 | |a prostatic urethral lift | |
700 | 1 | |a Doherty, Ruth |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Page, Toby |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Barber, Neil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kavia, Rajesh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Thiruchelvam, Nikesh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gange, Steven |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mueller, Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Eure, Gregg |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chin, Peter |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kayes, Oliver |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BJUI compass |d 2020 |g 5(2024), 1 vom: 22. Jan., Seite 60-69 |w (DE-627)NLM31074430X |x 2688-4526 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:22 |g month:01 |g pages:60-69 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.280 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 5 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 22 |c 01 |h 60-69 |