The effectiveness of mental health interventions involving non-specialists and digital technology in low-and middle-income countries - a systematic review

© 2023. The Author(s)..

BACKGROUND: Combining non-specialists and digital technologies in mental health interventions could decrease the mental healthcare gap in resource scarce countries. This systematic review examined different combinations of non-specialists and digital technologies in mental health interventions and their effectiveness in reducing the mental healthcare gap in low-and middle-income countries.

METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in four databases (September 2023), three trial registries (January-February 2022), and using forward and backward citation searches (May-June 2022). The review included primary studies on mental health interventions combining non-specialists and digital technologies in low-and middle-income countries. The outcomes were: (1) the mental health of intervention receivers and (2) the competencies of non-specialists to deliver mental health interventions. Data were expressed as standardised effect sizes (Cohen's d) and narratively synthesised. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for individual and cluster randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.

RESULTS: Of the 28 included studies (n = 32 interventions), digital technology was mainly used in non-specialist primary-delivery treatment models for common mental disorders or subthreshold symptoms. The competencies of non-specialists were improved with digital training (d ≤ 0.8 in 4/7 outcomes, n = 4 studies, 398 participants). The mental health of receivers improved through non-specialist-delivered interventions, in which digital technologies were used to support the delivery of the intervention (d > 0.8 in 24/40 outcomes, n = 11, 2469) or to supervise the non-specialists' work (d = 0.2-0.8 in 10/17 outcomes, n = 3, 3096). Additionally, the mental health of service receivers improved through digitally delivered mental health services with non-specialist involvement (d = 0.2-0.8 in 12/27 outcomes, n = 8, 2335). However, the overall certainty of the evidence was poor.

CONCLUSION: Incorporating digital technologies into non-specialist mental health interventions tended to enhance non-specialists' competencies and knowledge in intervention delivery, and had a positive influence on the severity of mental health problems, mental healthcare utilization, and psychosocial functioning outcomes of service recipients, primarily within primary-deliverer care models. More robust evidence is needed to compare the magnitude of effectiveness and identify the clinical relevance of specific digital functions. Future studies should also explore long-term and potential adverse effects and interventions targeting men and marginalised communities.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2024

Erschienen:

2024

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24

Enthalten in:

BMC public health - 24(2024), 1 vom: 03. Jan., Seite 77

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Mudiyanselage, Kalpani Wijekoon Wijekoon [VerfasserIn]
De Santis, Karina Karolina [VerfasserIn]
Jörg, Frederike [VerfasserIn]
Saleem, Maham [VerfasserIn]
Stewart, Roy [VerfasserIn]
Zeeb, Hajo [VerfasserIn]
Busse, Heide [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Digital technologies
Interventions
Journal Article
Low-and middle-income countries
Mental health
Mental healthcare
Non-specialists
Systematic Review
Systematic review
Task-sharing

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 05.01.2024

Date Revised 26.03.2024

published: Electronic

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1186/s12889-023-17417-6

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM366633317