Public controversy and citizens' attitude formation about animal research : A case for scholarship and recommendations on conflicts at the science-society interface
Copyright: © 2024 Link et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited..
Activist groups attack animal research and put scientists and their institutions under pressure, whereas scientists often remain silent. We report an interdisciplinary research project driven by a communication science perspective on how citizens respond to news reports about animal research (3 experiments, overall N = 765) and a German science-initiated information platform ("Tierversuche verstehen"; controlled user study, N = 100). Findings demonstrate that a critical journalist perspective within neutral, two-sided news reports (e.g., skeptical expert statements or images of suffering animals) does not affect citizen opinion strongly. Information media provided by scientific institutions seem to be welcomed even by citizens who hold critical prior attitudes. From these results, we develop a set of recommendations for future public communication of animal research that builds on best practices in organizational and crisis communication. These suggestions are intended to empower animal researchers to actively participate in public debate to support citizens' informed attitude formation.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:19 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
PloS one - 19(2024), 1 vom: 31., Seite e0295503 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Link, Elena [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 05.01.2024 Date Revised 06.01.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1371/journal.pone.0295503 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM366613162 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM366613162 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240108142639.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240108s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0295503 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1250.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM366613162 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38170693 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Link, Elena |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Public controversy and citizens' attitude formation about animal research |b A case for scholarship and recommendations on conflicts at the science-society interface |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 05.01.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 06.01.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright: © 2024 Link et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | ||
| 520 | |a Activist groups attack animal research and put scientists and their institutions under pressure, whereas scientists often remain silent. We report an interdisciplinary research project driven by a communication science perspective on how citizens respond to news reports about animal research (3 experiments, overall N = 765) and a German science-initiated information platform ("Tierversuche verstehen"; controlled user study, N = 100). Findings demonstrate that a critical journalist perspective within neutral, two-sided news reports (e.g., skeptical expert statements or images of suffering animals) does not affect citizen opinion strongly. Information media provided by scientific institutions seem to be welcomed even by citizens who hold critical prior attitudes. From these results, we develop a set of recommendations for future public communication of animal research that builds on best practices in organizational and crisis communication. These suggestions are intended to empower animal researchers to actively participate in public debate to support citizens' informed attitude formation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Emde-Lachmund, Katharina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bruns, Sophie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dittrich, Anja |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stiesch, Meike |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Haverich, Axel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Treue, Stefan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Klimmt, Christoph |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t PloS one |d 2006 |g 19(2024), 1 vom: 31., Seite e0295503 |w (DE-627)NLM167327399 |x 1932-6203 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:31 |g pages:e0295503 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295503 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 19 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 31 |h e0295503 | ||