Clinical efficacy of blood derivatives on wound healing : A systematic review and network meta-analysis
© 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
This study aims to evaluate the clinical effects of different blood derivatives on wound healing using network meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, OVID, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Cochrane Central were searched to obtain studies about blood derivatives on wound healing until October 2023. R 4.2.0 and Stata 15.0 softwares were used for data analysis. Forty-four studies comprising 5164 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the healing area from high to low was GF + ORCCB, ORCCB, GF, PRF, Unnas paste dressing, APG, PRP injection, PRP, PRP + thrombin gel, PPP, HPL, CT. The healing time from low to high was PRP + thrombin gel, GF, PRP, PC + K, PC, APG, PRF, CT, Silver sulfadiazine ointment. The number of patients cured from high to low was APG, PRP injection, PRP, Aurix, PRF, Leucopatch, HPL, Antimicrobial Ointment Dressing, CT, 60 μg/cm2 repifermin, 120 μg/cm2 repifermin, AFG, PPP. The order of analgesic effect from high to low was AFG, Aminogam gel, PRF, PRP, Oxidised oil, APG, GF, CT. The order of the number of wound infection cases from low to high is APG, 20 μg/cm2 repifermin, 60 μg/cm2 repifermin, PRP, LeucoPatch, CT, PPP, Antiseptic ointment dressing. Healing area: GF + ORCCB had the best effect; Healing time: PRP + thrombin gel took the shortest time. The number of cured patients and the reduction of wound infection: APG has the best effect. Analgesic effect: AFG has the best effect. More studies with large sample sizes are needed to confirm the above findings.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:21 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International wound journal - 21(2024), 4 vom: 01. März, Seite e14622 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Wu, Yanhong [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Analgesics |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.03.2024 Date Revised 27.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1111/iwj.14622 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM366495224 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM366495224 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240327235600.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240108s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/iwj.14622 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1351.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM366495224 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38158884 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wu, Yanhong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clinical efficacy of blood derivatives on wound healing |b A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 26.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 27.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
| 520 | |a This study aims to evaluate the clinical effects of different blood derivatives on wound healing using network meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, OVID, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Cochrane Central were searched to obtain studies about blood derivatives on wound healing until October 2023. R 4.2.0 and Stata 15.0 softwares were used for data analysis. Forty-four studies comprising 5164 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the healing area from high to low was GF + ORCCB, ORCCB, GF, PRF, Unnas paste dressing, APG, PRP injection, PRP, PRP + thrombin gel, PPP, HPL, CT. The healing time from low to high was PRP + thrombin gel, GF, PRP, PC + K, PC, APG, PRF, CT, Silver sulfadiazine ointment. The number of patients cured from high to low was APG, PRP injection, PRP, Aurix, PRF, Leucopatch, HPL, Antimicrobial Ointment Dressing, CT, 60 μg/cm2 repifermin, 120 μg/cm2 repifermin, AFG, PPP. The order of analgesic effect from high to low was AFG, Aminogam gel, PRF, PRP, Oxidised oil, APG, GF, CT. The order of the number of wound infection cases from low to high is APG, 20 μg/cm2 repifermin, 60 μg/cm2 repifermin, PRP, LeucoPatch, CT, PPP, Antiseptic ointment dressing. Healing area: GF + ORCCB had the best effect; Healing time: PRP + thrombin gel took the shortest time. The number of cured patients and the reduction of wound infection: APG has the best effect. Analgesic effect: AFG has the best effect. More studies with large sample sizes are needed to confirm the above findings | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a blood derivatives | |
| 650 | 4 | |a clinical effect | |
| 650 | 4 | |a network meta‐analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a wound healing | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Thrombin |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EC 3.4.21.5 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ointments |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Fibroblast Growth Factor 10 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Analgesics |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Peng, Guang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Yuzhi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Jianwu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Bin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tang, Jianbing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cheng, Biao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International wound journal |d 2004 |g 21(2024), 4 vom: 01. März, Seite e14622 |w (DE-627)NLM162044909 |x 1742-481X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g day:01 |g month:03 |g pages:e14622 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14622 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 2024 |e 4 |b 01 |c 03 |h e14622 | ||